These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25847057)
1. Comparing Methods to Denote Treatment Outcome in Clinical Research and Benchmarking Mental Health Care. de Beurs E; Barendregt M; de Heer A; van Duijn E; Goeree B; Kloos M; Kooiman K; Lionarons H; Merks A Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016 Jul; 23(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 25847057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Denoting treatment outcome in child and adolescent psychiatry: a comparison of continuous and categorical outcomes. de Beurs E; Barendregt M; Rogmans B; Robbers S; van Geffen M; van Aggelen-Gerrits M; Houben H Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2015 May; 24(5):553-63. PubMed ID: 25183369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment results for severe psychiatric illness: which method is best suited to denote the outcome of mental health care? de Beurs E; Blankers M; Delespaul P; van Duijn E; Mulder N; Nugter A; Swildens W; Tiemens BG; Theunissen J; van Voorst AFA; van Weeghel J BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jul; 18(1):225. PubMed ID: 30005594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaches to denote treatment outcome: Clinical significance and clinical global impression compared. de Beurs E; Carlier IVE; van Hemert AM Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2019 Dec; 28(4):e1797. PubMed ID: 31597212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy (PIT) in routine clinical practice: a benchmarking comparison. Paley G; Cahill J; Barkham M; Shapiro D; Jones J; Patrick S; Reid E Psychol Psychother; 2008 Jun; 81(Pt 2):157-75. PubMed ID: 18179736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment Outcome, Duration, and Costs: A Comparison of Performance Indicators Using Data from Eight Mental Health Care Providers in The Netherlands. de Beurs E; Warmerdam EH; Oudejans SCC; Spits M; Dingemanse P; de Graaf SDD; de Groot IW; Houben H; Kuyck WGE; Noorthoorn EO; Nugter MA; Robbers SCC; van Son GE Adm Policy Ment Health; 2018 Mar; 45(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 28735344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinically significant and practical! Enhancing precision does make a difference. Reply to McGlinchey and Jacobson, Hsu, and Speer. Hageman WJ; Arrindell WA Behav Res Ther; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1219-33. PubMed ID: 10596468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Response and remission in psychotherapy research]. Hiller W; Schindler A Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2011 Mar; 61(3-4):170-6. PubMed ID: 20645238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Responsiveness to Therapeutic Change with Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Comparison of the Symptom Questionnaire-48 (SQ-48) with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45). Carlier IV; Kovács V; van Noorden MS; van der Feltz-Cornelis C; Mooij N; Schulte-van Maaren YW; van Hemert AM; Zitman FG; Giltay EJ Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 26450457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The association between waiting for psychological therapy and therapy outcomes as measured by the CORE-OM. Beck A; Burdett M; Lewis H Br J Clin Psychol; 2015 Jun; 54(2):233-48. PubMed ID: 25425180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of graduate clinicians' personal therapy on therapeutic alliance. Gold SH; Hilsenroth MJ Clin Psychol Psychother; 2009; 16(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 19253265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cut-off Scores and Clinical Change Indices for the Dutch Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Large Sample of Normal and Several Psychotherapeutic Populations. Timman R; de Jong K; de Neve-Enthoven N Clin Psychol Psychother; 2017 Jan; 24(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 26497324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Youth psychotherapy outcomes in usual care and predictors of outcome group membership. Smith AM; Jensen-Doss A Psychol Serv; 2017 Feb; 14(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 27775402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically significant but impractical? A response to Hageman and Arrindell. McGlinchey JB; Jacobson NS Behav Res Ther; 1999 Dec; 37(12):1211-7; discussion 1219-33. PubMed ID: 10596467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation]. Giraldes Mdo R Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ranking hospitals: do we gain reliability by using composite rather than individual indicators? Hofstede SN; Ceyisakar IE; Lingsma HF; Kringos DS; Marang-van de Mheen PJ BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 29789406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Shimokawa K; Lambert MJ; Smart DW J Consult Clin Psychol; 2010 Jun; 78(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 20515206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]