BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25847911)

  • 1. Generalized linear mixed models for multi-reader multi-case studies of diagnostic tests.
    Liu W; Pantoja-Galicia N; Zhang B; Kotz RM; Pennello G; Zhang H; Jacob J; Zhang Z
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1373-1388. PubMed ID: 25847911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2067-2093. PubMed ID: 29609206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obuchowski-Rockette analysis for multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) readers-nested-in-test study design with unequal numbers of readers.
    Hillis SL; Soh BP
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2023 Feb; 12467():. PubMed ID: 37736244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis: an empirical comparison of five methods.
    Obuchowski NA; Beiden SV; Berbaum KS; Hillis SL; Ishwaran H; Song HH; Wagner RF
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):980-95. PubMed ID: 15350579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
    Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.
    Dendumrongsup T; Plumb AA; Halligan S; Fanshawe TR; Altman DG; Mallett S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116018. PubMed ID: 25541977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe and Metz identical-test simulation model for validating multi-reader methods of analysis for comparing different radiologic imaging modalities.
    Hillis SL
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 1):S11916. PubMed ID: 37416057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between Obuchowski-Rockette-Hillis and Gallas methods for analyzing multi-reader diagnostic imaging data with empirical AUC as the reader performance measure.
    Hillis SL
    Biostat Epidemiol; 2023; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 37719421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MATLAB toolbox for ROC analysis of multi-reader multi-case diagnostic imaging studies.
    Smith BJ; Hillis SL
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12035():. PubMed ID: 36159880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
    Hwang YT; Wang CC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
    Gallas BD; Brown DG
    Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
    Qin G; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
    Gallas BD
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16488848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating latent reader-performance variability using the Obuchowski-Rockette method.
    Hillis SL; Mohammad BA; Brennan PC
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2019 Feb; 10952():. PubMed ID: 32390679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demonstration of Multi- and Single-Reader Sample Size Program for Diagnostic Studies software.
    Hillis SL; Schartz KM
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2015 Feb; 9416():. PubMed ID: 28890592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
    Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.
    Jin H; Lu Y
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.