BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25849068)

  • 1. A Comparative Study Between the Wingate and Force-Velocity Anaerobic Cycling Tests: Effect of Physical Fitness.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Jan; 11(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 25849068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power versus strength-power jump squat training: influence on the load-power relationship.
    Cormie P; McCaulley GO; McBride JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Jun; 39(6):996-1003. PubMed ID: 17545891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of the optimal load setting for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women.
    Forbes SC; Kennedy MD; Boule NB; Bell G
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 35(10):835-9. PubMed ID: 24920563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of load on wingate test performances and reliability.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Coudrat L; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3462-8. PubMed ID: 24936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allometric scaling of Wingate anaerobic power test scores in men.
    Stickley CD; Hetzler RK; Wages JJ; Freemyer BG; Kimura IF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Sep; 27(9):2603-11. PubMed ID: 23364295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximal power outputs during the Wingate anaerobic test.
    Patton JF; Murphy MM; Frederick FA
    Int J Sports Med; 1985 Apr; 6(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 4008145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of time-of-day and Ramadan fasting on anaerobic performances.
    Chtourou H; Hammouda O; Chaouachi A; Chamari K; Souissi N
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 33(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22318530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of a 3-min all-out Arm Crank Ergometer Exercise Test.
    Flueck JL; Lienert M; Schaufelberger F; Perret C
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 36(10):809-13. PubMed ID: 26038881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wingate anaerobic test reference values for male power athletes.
    Coppin E; Heath EM; Bressel E; Wagner DR
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2012 Sep; 7(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 22174179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a prior force-velocity test performed with legs on subsequent peak power output measured with arms or vice versa.
    Bouhlel E; Chelly MS; Gmada N; Tabka Z; Shephard R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Apr; 24(4):992-8. PubMed ID: 20300028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of optimal load in the Wingate Anaerobic Test is not depend on number of sprints included in mathematical models.
    Michalik K; Smolarek M; Ochmann B; Zatoń M
    Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1146076. PubMed ID: 37324399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Circadian rhythms in two types of anaerobic cycle leg exercise: force-velocity and 30-s Wingate tests.
    Souissi N; Gauthier A; Sesboüé B; Larue J; Davenne D
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Jan; 25(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 14750007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caffeine mouth rinse has no effects on anaerobic energy yield during a Wingate Test.
    Marinho AH; Mendes EV; Vilela RA; Bastos-Silva VJ; Araujo GG; Balikian P
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2020 Jan; 60(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 31640317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wingate Anaerobic Test Percentile Norms in Colombian Healthy Adults.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; López-Albán CA; La Rotta-Villamizar DR; Romero-García JA; Alonso-Martinez AM; Izquierdo M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jan; 30(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 26691412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modification of the Wingate anaerobic power test for rowing: optimization of the resistance setting.
    Mandic S; Quinney HA; Bell GJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 25(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 15346227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment.
    Sanchez-Medina L; Perez CE; Gonzalez-Badillo JJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Feb; 31(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 20222005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does power indicate capacity? 30-s Wingate anaerobic test vs. maximal accumulated O2 deficit.
    Minahan C; Chia M; Inbar O
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 28(10):836-43. PubMed ID: 17497577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between countermovement jump performance and multijoint isometric and dynamic tests of strength.
    Nuzzo JL; McBride JM; Cormie P; McCaulley GO
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 18438251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peak power during repeated wingate trials: implications for testing.
    Kohler RM; Rundell KW; Evans TM; Levine AM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):370-4. PubMed ID: 19620898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.