451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25849094)
1. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Students' attitudes towards an on-line orthodontic learning resource.
Linjawi AL; Hamdan AM; Perryer DG; Walmsley AD; Hill KB
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 May; 13(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19368551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students.
Doucet M; Vrins A; Harvey D
Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):e570-9. PubMed ID: 19995158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two interactions when teaching principles of orthodontic appliances.
Aly M; Elen J; Willems G
Eur J Dent Educ; 2005 Nov; 9(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 16194247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an audience response system in a preclinical operative dentistry course.
Elashvili A; Denehy GE; Dawson DV; Cunningham MA
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1296-303. PubMed ID: 18981208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of an audience response system on orthodontic knowledge retention of undergraduate dental students--a randomised control trial.
Robson N; Popat H; Richmond S; Farnell DJ
J Orthod; 2015; 42(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 26282015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates.
Bains M; Reynolds PA; McDonald F; Sherriff M
Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 May; 15(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 21492347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactive audience response systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology undergraduate lectures.
de Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C; Rodrigues CT; Domaneschi C; Caldeira Monteiro SA
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Feb; 22(1):e63-e69. PubMed ID: 28294484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-assisted learning in orthodontic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Jewair TS; Azarpazhooh A; Suri S; Shah PS
J Dent Educ; 2009 Jun; 73(6):730-9. PubMed ID: 19491350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a Web-Based Patient Simulation Program to Teach Dental Students in Oral Surgery.
Weiner CK; Skålén M; Harju-Jeanty D; Heymann R; Rosén A; Fors U; Lund B
J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 26834130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontic undergraduate education: developments in a modern curriculum.
Chadwick SM; Bearn DR; Jack AC; O'Brien KD
Eur J Dent Educ; 2002 May; 6(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 11975666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study to determine if changes to an undergraduate orthodontic course improved course quality and student satisfaction.
Kindelan J; Roberts-Harry D; Luther F
Eur J Dent Educ; 1997 Aug; 1(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 9567919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Undergraduate dental education in New Zealand: 2007-2009 final-year student feedback on clinical learning environments.
Anderson VR; Rich AM; Seymour GJ
N Z Dent J; 2011 Sep; 107(3):85-90. PubMed ID: 21957835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
Cain J; Black EP; Rohr J
Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(2):21. PubMed ID: 19513159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using an audience response system to improve learning success in practical skills training courses in dental studies - a randomised, controlled cross-over study.
Wenz HJ; Zupanic M; Klosa K; Schneider B; Karsten G
Eur J Dent Educ; 2014 Aug; 18(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 24314301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
