These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2584969)

  • 1. Efficacy of diethyl methylbenzamide (deet) against Aedes dorsalis and a comparison of two end points for protection time.
    Rutledge LC; Hooper RL; Wirtz RA; Gupta RK
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Sep; 5(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 2584969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A field trial of ethyl hexanediol against Aedes dorsalis in Sonoma County, California.
    Rutledge LC; Hooper RL; Wirtz RA; Gupta RK
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Sep; 5(3):374-6. PubMed ID: 2584970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of skin abrasions on the efficacy of the repellent deet against Aedes aegypti.
    Rueda LM; Rutledge LC; Gupta RK
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Jun; 14(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 9673919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.
    Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory and field evaluations of the insect repellent 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet against mosquito vectors in Thailand.
    Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Chompoosri J; Suwonkerd W; Chansang UR; Asavadachanukorn P
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Sep; 17(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 14529087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes.
    Costantini C; Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Nov; 98(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 15363644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repellency of two controlled-release formulations of deet against Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Aedes taeniorhynchus mosquitoes.
    Schreck CE; Kline DL
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Mar; 5(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 2708995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attraction of mosquitoes to diethyl methylbenzamide and ethyl hexanediol.
    Mehr ZA; Rutledge LC; Buescher MD; Gupta RK; Zakaria MM
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1990 Sep; 6(3):469-76. PubMed ID: 2230775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of partial blood engorgement and pretest carbohydrate availability on the repellency of deet to Aedes albopictus.
    Xue RD; Barnard DR
    J Vector Ecol; 1999 Dec; 24(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 10672540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mathematical models of the effectiveness and persistence of mosquito repellents.
    Rutledge LC; Wirtz RA; Buescher MD; Mehr ZA
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1985 Mar; 1(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 2906657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field efficacy of four insect repellent products against vector mosquitoes in a tropical environment.
    Yap HH; Jahangir K; Zairi J
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2000 Sep; 16(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 11081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterisation of actions of p-menthane-3,8-diol repellent formulations against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.
    Goodyer L; Grootveld M; Deobhankar K; Debboun M; Philip M
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2020 Sep; 114(9):687-692. PubMed ID: 32542324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the mosquito-repelling efficacy of methyl neodecanamide (MNDA) to that of Deet.
    Polefka TG; Liang LJ; Ananthakrishnan TN
    J Cosmet Sci; 2003; 54(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12858227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field evaluation of arthropod repellents, deet and a piperidine compound, AI3-37220, against Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya.
    Walker TW; Robert LL; Copeland RA; Githeko AK; Wirtz RA; Githure JI; Klein TA
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1996 Jun; 12(2 Pt 1):172-6. PubMed ID: 8827589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of topical permethrin as repellent against Aedes aegypti's bites.
    Miot HA; Ferreira DP; Mendes FG; Carrenho FR; de Oliveira Amui I; Carneiro CA; Madeira NG
    Dermatol Online J; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1. PubMed ID: 18718185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repellency of aromatic medicinal plant extracts and a steam distillate to Aedes aegypti.
    Yang YC; Lee EH; Lee HS; Lee DK; Ahn YJ
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Jun; 20(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 15264623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repellents and other personal protection strategies against Aedes albopictus.
    Schreck CE; McGovern TP
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1989 Jun; 5(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 2746209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative resistance of Anopheles albimanus and Aedes aegypti to N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (Deet) and 2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexen-1-carboxamide (AI3-37220) in laboratory human-volunteer repellent assays.
    Klun JA; Strickman D; Rowton E; Williams J; Kramer M; Roberts D; Debboun M
    J Med Entomol; 2004 May; 41(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 15185944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response of Anopheles dirus and Aedes albopictus to repellents in the laboratory.
    Frances SP; Eikarat N; Sripongsai B; Eamsila C
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1993 Dec; 9(4):474-6. PubMed ID: 8126487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharmacokinetics, formulation, and safety of insect repellent N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet): a review.
    Qiu H; Jun HW; McCall JW
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Mar; 14(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 9599319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.