These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up. DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation. Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays? Hanzlik JA; Day JS; Rimnac CM; Kurtz SM; J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 25743106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up. Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a 3D-printed total knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: assessment of highly porous biological fixation of the tibial baseplate and metal-backed patellar component. Sporer S; MacLean L; Burger A; Moric M Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7_Supple_C):40-47. PubMed ID: 31256643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osseointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty. The influence of component coating type in sheep. Bellemans J Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Oct; 288():1-35. PubMed ID: 10949554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic retrieval analysis of a porous tantalum metal implant in an infected primary total knee arthroplasty. Sambaziotis C; Lovy AJ; Koller KE; Bloebaum RD; Hirsh DM; Kim SJ J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1413.e5-9. PubMed ID: 22178612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone growth into a revised porous-coated patellar implant. Jensen LN; Lund B; Gotfredsen K Acta Orthop Scand; 1990 Jun; 61(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 2371813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis. Results after five to nine years: a follow-up note. Wright J; Ewald FC; Walker PS; Thomas WH; Poss R; Sledge CB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Aug; 72(7):1003-9. PubMed ID: 2384498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new model to assess tibial fixation in knee arthroplasty. I. Histologic and roentgenographic results. Stulberg BN; Watson JT; Stulberg SD; Bauer TW; Manley MT Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Feb; (263):288-302. PubMed ID: 1993384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prosthesis-bone interface adjacent to tibial components inserted without cement. Clinical and radiographic follow-up at nine to twelve years. Silverton C; Rosenberg AO; Barden RM; Sheinkop MB; Galante JO J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Mar; 78(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 8613440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]