518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25849937)
1. Structural variation discovery in the cancer genome using next generation sequencing: computational solutions and perspectives.
Liu B; Conroy JM; Morrison CD; Odunsi AO; Qin M; Wei L; Trump DL; Johnson CS; Liu S; Wang J
Oncotarget; 2015 Mar; 6(8):5477-89. PubMed ID: 25849937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural variation detection using next-generation sequencing data: A comparative technical review.
Guan P; Sung WK
Methods; 2016 Jun; 102():36-49. PubMed ID: 26845461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational methods for detecting copy number variations in cancer genome using next generation sequencing: principles and challenges.
Liu B; Morrison CD; Johnson CS; Trump DL; Qin M; Conroy JC; Wang J; Liu S
Oncotarget; 2013 Nov; 4(11):1868-81. PubMed ID: 24240121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Next generation mapping reveals novel large genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.
Jaratlerdsiri W; Chan EKF; Petersen DC; Yang C; Croucher PI; Bornman MSR; Sheth P; Hayes VM
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23588-23602. PubMed ID: 28423598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HySA: a Hybrid Structural variant Assembly approach using next-generation and single-molecule sequencing technologies.
Fan X; Chaisson M; Nakhleh L; Chen K
Genome Res; 2017 May; 27(5):793-800. PubMed ID: 28104618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SCNVSim: somatic copy number variation and structure variation simulator.
Qin M; Liu B; Conroy JM; Morrison CD; Hu Q; Cheng Y; Murakami M; Odunsi AO; Johnson CS; Wei L; Liu S; Wang J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 25886838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of multiple algorithms to reliably detect structural variants in pears.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Chang W; Sun M; Zhang S; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 31959124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome-towards a human reference diploid genome.
English AC; Salerno WJ; Hampton OA; Gonzaga-Jauregui C; Ambreth S; Ritter DI; Beck CR; Davis CF; Dahdouli M; Ma S; Carroll A; Veeraraghavan N; Bruestle J; Drees B; Hastie A; Lam ET; White S; Mishra P; Wang M; Han Y; Zhang F; Stankiewicz P; Wheeler DA; Reid JG; Muzny DM; Rogers J; Sabo A; Worley KC; Lupski JR; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):286. PubMed ID: 25886820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-genome sequencing with long reads reveals complex structure and origin of structural variation in human genetic variations and somatic mutations in cancer.
Fujimoto A; Wong JH; Yoshii Y; Akiyama S; Tanaka A; Yagi H; Shigemizu D; Nakagawa H; Mizokami M; Shimada M
Genome Med; 2021 Apr; 13(1):65. PubMed ID: 33910608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gustaf: Detecting and correctly classifying SVs in the NGS twilight zone.
Trappe K; Emde AK; Ehrlich HC; Reinert K
Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3484-90. PubMed ID: 25028727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural variant analysis of a cancer reference cell line sample using multiple sequencing technologies.
Talsania K; Shen TW; Chen X; Jaeger E; Li Z; Chen Z; Chen W; Tran B; Kusko R; Wang L; Pang AWC; Yang Z; Choudhari S; Colgan M; Fang LT; Carroll A; Shetty J; Kriga Y; German O; Smirnova T; Liu T; Li J; Kellman B; Hong K; Hastie AR; Natarajan A; Moshrefi A; Granat A; Truong T; Bombardi R; Mankinen V; Meerzaman D; Mason CE; Collins J; Stahlberg E; Xiao C; Wang C; Xiao W; Zhao Y
Genome Biol; 2022 Dec; 23(1):255. PubMed ID: 36514120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patterns and mechanisms of structural variations in human cancer.
Yi K; Ju YS
Exp Mol Med; 2018 Aug; 50(8):1-11. PubMed ID: 30089796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical application of amplicon-based next-generation sequencing in cancer.
Chang F; Li MM
Cancer Genet; 2013 Dec; 206(12):413-9. PubMed ID: 24332266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Somatic structural variation and cancer.
Tubio JM
Brief Funct Genomics; 2015 Sep; 14(5):339-51. PubMed ID: 25903743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. COSMOS: accurate detection of somatic structural variations through asymmetric comparison between tumor and normal samples.
Yamagata K; Yamanishi A; Kokubu C; Takeda J; Sese J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 May; 44(8):e78. PubMed ID: 26833260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Practical Guide for Structural Variation Detection in the Human Genome.
Yang L
Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2020 Sep; 107(1):e103. PubMed ID: 32813322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precise characterization of somatic complex structural variations from tumor/control paired long-read sequencing data with nanomonsv.
Shiraishi Y; Koya J; Chiba K; Okada A; Arai Y; Saito Y; Shibata T; Kataoka K
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Aug; 51(14):e74. PubMed ID: 37336583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational methods and resources for the interpretation of genomic variants in cancer.
Tian R; Basu MK; Capriotti E
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S7. PubMed ID: 26111056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.
Kosugi S; Momozawa Y; Liu X; Terao C; Kubo M; Kamatani Y
Genome Biol; 2019 Jun; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 31159850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local sequence assembly reveals a high-resolution profile of somatic structural variations in 97 cancer genomes.
Zhuang J; Weng Z
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Sep; 43(17):8146-56. PubMed ID: 26283183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
