BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25849992)

  • 1. Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.
    Haselhuhn MP; Ormiston ME; Wong EM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122637. PubMed ID: 25849992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
    Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R
    Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance.
    Noser E; Schoch J; Ehlert U
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207333. PubMed ID: 30412629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further evidence for links between facial width-to-height ratio and fighting success: Commentary on Zilioli et al. (2014).
    Třebický V; Fialová J; Kleisner K; Roberts SC; Little AC; Havlíček J
    Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 25236530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
    Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
    Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Body mass index, facial width-to-height ratio, and perceived formidability in female Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fighters.
    Palmer-Hague JL; Twele AC; Fuller AJ
    Aggress Behav; 2018 Nov; 44(6):553-560. PubMed ID: 29956344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.
    Goetz SM; Shattuck KS; Miller RM; Campbell JA; Lozoya E; Weisfeld GE; Carré JM
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 24068116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.
    Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV
    Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Sex Drive, Sociosexuality, and Intended Infidelity.
    Arnocky S; Carré JM; Bird BM; Moreau BJP; Vaillancourt T; Ortiz T; Marley N
    Arch Sex Behav; 2018 Jul; 47(5):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 28929303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
    Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-fulfilling prophecies as a link between men's facial width-to-height ratio and behavior.
    Haselhuhn MP; Wong EM; Ormiston ME
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72259. PubMed ID: 24015226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Does Not Predict Self-Reported Behavioral Tendencies.
    Kosinski M
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 28976810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial width-to-height ratio in a large sample of Commonwealth Games athletes.
    Kramer RS
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Feb; 13(1):197-209. PubMed ID: 25714799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.
    Hodges-Simeon CR; Hanson Sobraske KN; Samore T; Gurven M; Gaulin SJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153083. PubMed ID: 27078636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Association Between Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) and Sporting Performances: Evidence From Professional Basketball Players in Japan.
    Sato S; Kinoshita K; Sekino K; Amano H; Bizen Y; Matsuoka H
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714819. PubMed ID: 34484074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial width-to-height ratio differs by social rank across organizations, countries, and value systems.
    Hahn T; Winter NR; Anderl C; Notebaert K; Wuttke AM; Clément CC; Windmann S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187957. PubMed ID: 29121113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness.
    Geniole SN; Molnar DS; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1526-41. PubMed ID: 24820443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What lies beneath the face of aggression?
    Carré JM; Murphy KR; Hariri AR
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 8(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22198969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire.
    Zhang W; Hahn AC; Cai Z; Lee AJ; Holzleitner IJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200308. PubMed ID: 30020967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity.
    Deska JC; Lloyd EP; Hugenberg K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 114(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 28846003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.