These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2585003)

  • 1. The Gold Rush of '89.
    Counts RW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1989 Sep; 3(3):285-6. PubMed ID: 2585003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patent reform, pending.
    Kahaner L
    Across Board (NY); 1984 Sep; 21(9):36-9. PubMed ID: 10278269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patents versus settling for the soft option.
    Carter S
    Med Device Technol; 2004 Mar; 15(2):19. PubMed ID: 15154334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Software patents await legal fate.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2014 Mar; 507(7493):410-1. PubMed ID: 24670739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Software patent ruling gives pointers for diagnostics.
    Harrison C
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2014 Aug; 13(8):569. PubMed ID: 25082281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tweaks to the idea factory.
    Kappos DJ
    Sci Am; 2013 Jun; 308(6):14. PubMed ID: 23729058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patent reform prompts intellectual tug-of-war.
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7063):1230-1. PubMed ID: 16251923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patents, biotechnology, and hematologic pathology.
    Kettelberger DM; Gambrell P; McClung G
    Hematol Pathol; 1992; 6(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1607346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robert Stoll. Interview by Charlotte Harrison.
    Stoll R
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2009 Dec; 8(12):926. PubMed ID: 19949397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Napster case spills into biotech sector.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1185-6. PubMed ID: 15384189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US personalized-medicine industry takes hit from Supreme Court.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7617):382. PubMed ID: 27558042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dangerous copyright proposals hit medical community hard.
    Geist M
    CMAJ; 2005 Apr; 172(8):989-90. PubMed ID: 15824398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patenting life.
    O'Connor KW
    Cancer Invest; 1992; 10(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 1735013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospitals and healthcare systems should take note of software copyright laws.
    Patient Acc; 1996 Jun; 19(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 10158364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer software and copyright protection: health care implications.
    Roarke RF; Szenczy C
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1992; 12(4):5-11. PubMed ID: 10121894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal issues for chem-bioinformatics models.
    Duardo-Sanchez A; Gonzalez-Diaz H
    Front Biosci (Elite Ed); 2013 Jan; 5(1):361-74. PubMed ID: 23276995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court's war on intellectual property.
    Gardner JN
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 10625402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Copyright protection of computer program object code.
    Harv Law Rev; 1983 May; 96(7):1723-44. PubMed ID: 10278189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal aspects of purchasing microcomputer software.
    Warrick TS
    Bull Am Soc Inf Sci; 1984 Aug; 10(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 10278277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Community registered design.
    Carter S
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):8. PubMed ID: 12789691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.