These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25850116)

  • 1. Smartphone Text Input Method Performance, Usability, and Preference With Younger and Older Adults.
    Smith AL; Chaparro BS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):1015-28. PubMed ID: 25850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smartphone text input: Effects of experience and phrase complexity on user performance, physiological reaction, and perceived usability.
    Li Y; You F; You X; Ji M
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():200-208. PubMed ID: 31280806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual Sliding QWERTY: A new text entry method for smartwatches using Tap-N-Drag.
    Cha JM; Choi E; Lim J
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Nov; 51():263-72. PubMed ID: 26154225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Text entry on handheld computers by older users.
    Wright P; Bartram C; Rogers N; Emslie H; Evans J; Wilson B; Belt S
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):702-16. PubMed ID: 10902881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New chording text entry methods combining physical and virtual buttons on a mobile phone.
    Wu FG; Huang YC; Wu ML
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 24263072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing design features of virtual keyboards for text entry.
    O'Brien MA; Rogers WA; Fisk AD; Richman M
    Hum Factors; 2008 Aug; 50(4):680-98. PubMed ID: 18767526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usability of curved keyboard design on the large smartphone: An empirical study.
    Wang Y; Huo J; Wu D; Lin T; Li X; He J
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Nov; 113():104013. PubMed ID: 37422987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using analytic network process for evaluating mobile text entry methods.
    Ocampo LA; Seva RR
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():232-41. PubMed ID: 26360215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Typing on a Smartwatch While Mobile: A Comparison of Input Methods.
    Turner CJ; Chaparro BS; He J
    Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 63(6):974-986. PubMed ID: 32031892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of keyboard, light pen and voice recognition as methods of data input.
    Murchie CJ; Kenny GN
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1988; 5(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 3241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of age in usability testing.
    Sonderegger A; Schmutz S; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():291-300. PubMed ID: 26360221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BrailleEasy: One-handed Braille Keyboard for Smartphones.
    Šepić B; Ghanem A; Vogel S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 217():1030-5. PubMed ID: 26294606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Older and Younger Adults.
    Gao Q; Sun Q
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):835-63. PubMed ID: 25957042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults.
    Armbrüster C; Sutter C; Ziefle M
    Ergonomics; 2007 Mar; 50(3):426-45. PubMed ID: 17536778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of Chinese text entry performance for mobile display interfaces.
    Lin PH
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 25260062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application.
    Goedhart G; Kromhout H; Wiart J; Vermeulen R
    Occup Environ Med; 2015 Nov; 72(11):812-8. PubMed ID: 26311820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for an elders' advantage in the naive product usability judgments of older and younger adults.
    Stephens EC; Carswell CM; Schumacher MM
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):422-33. PubMed ID: 17063959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.