These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25850161)

  • 1. Dynamic vibrotactile signals for forward collision avoidance warning systems.
    Meng F; Gray R; Ho C; Ahtamad M; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):329-46. PubMed ID: 25850161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic vibrotactile warning signals for frontal collision avoidance: towards the torso versus towards the head.
    Meng F; Ho C; Gray R; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 25374255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of different informative vibrotactile forward collision warnings: does the warning need to be linked to the collision event?
    Gray R; Ho C; Spence C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87070. PubMed ID: 24475225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems.
    Meng F; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Feb; 75():333-46. PubMed ID: 25569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reorienting driver attention with dynamic tactile cues.
    Ho C; Gray R; Spence C
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014 Mar; 7(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 24845749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looming auditory collision warnings for driving.
    Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21469534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat.
    Petermeijer SM; Cieler S; de Winter JCF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):218-227. PubMed ID: 27978486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Warning Drivers about Impending Collisions Using Vibrotactile Flow.
    Ahtamad M; Spence C; Ho C; Gray R
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2016; 9(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 26625421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using peripersonal warning signals to orient a driver's gaze.
    Ho C; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2009 Aug; 51(4):539-56. PubMed ID: 19899363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop.
    Petermeijer S; Bazilinskyy P; Bengler K; de Winter J
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():204-215. PubMed ID: 28411731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research.
    Zhu A; Choi ATH; Ma KH; Cao S; Yao H; Wu J; He J
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Dec; (166):. PubMed ID: 33393516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention.
    Ho C; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):724-38. PubMed ID: 16720531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of Lateral Auditory Collision Warnings: Should Warnings Be Toward Danger or Toward Safety?
    Chen J; Šabić E; Mishler S; Parker C; Yamaguchi M
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):418-435. PubMed ID: 32779474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.