These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25850162)

  • 1. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
    Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver's adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems.
    Peng Y; Boyle LN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():93-101. PubMed ID: 26406538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver-initiated distractions: examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Jan; 41(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19114145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In the eye of the beholder: A simulator study of the impact of Google Glass on driving performance.
    Young KL; Stephens AN; Stephan KL; Stuart GW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jan; 86():68-75. PubMed ID: 26519889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the effects of an eco-driving message on driver distraction.
    Rouzikhah H; King M; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():975-83. PubMed ID: 22910188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of using a portable music player on simulated driving performance and task-sharing strategies.
    Young KL; Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):738-46. PubMed ID: 22118952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.
    Schneidereit T; Petzoldt T; Keinath A; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():33-42. PubMed ID: 28882275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential in-vehicle glance distributions: an alternative approach for analyzing glance data.
    Yamani Y; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Fisher DL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 25977319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 17109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-Relevant Smartphone Messages Within Work Zones: A Driving Simulation Study.
    Craig CM; Tian D; Morris NL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1786-1797. PubMed ID: 37127401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.