429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25850583)
1. ART for head and neck patients: On the difference between VMAT and IMPT.
Góra J; Kuess P; Stock M; Andrzejewski P; Knäusl B; Paskeviciute B; Altorjai G; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(8):1166-74. PubMed ID: 25850583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes.
Stützer K; Jakobi A; Bandurska-Luque A; Barczyk S; Arnsmeyer C; Löck S; Richter C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):104-113. PubMed ID: 28921843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small-spot intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapies for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A dosimetric comparative study.
Liu C; Sio TT; Deng W; Shan J; Daniels TB; Rule WG; Lara PR; Korte SM; Shen J; Ding X; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 30328674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there room for combined modality treatments? Dosimetric comparison of boost strategies for advanced head and neck and prostate cancer.
Góra J; Hopfgartner J; Kuess P; Paskeviciute B; Georg D
J Radiat Res; 2013 Jul; 54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i97-112. PubMed ID: 23824134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Angiosarcoma of the Scalp.
Mizuno T; Tomita N; Takaoka T; Tomida M; Fukuma H; Tsuchiya T; Shibamoto Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():1533033820985866. PubMed ID: 33517860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for distal esophageal cancer.
Barsky AR; George J; Wroe AJ; Mittauer KE; Kaiser A; Herrera R; Yu J; Gutierrez AN; Alvarez D; McCulloch J; Kasper ME; Mehta MP; Chuong MD
Med Dosim; 2024 Summer; 49(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 38001010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic Lymph Node Irradiation Including Pararectal Sentinel Nodes for Prostate Cancer Patients: Treatment Optimization Comparing Intensity Modulated X-rays, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy.
Vees H; Dipasquale G; Nouet P; Zilli T; Cozzi L; Miralbell R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Apr; 14(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 24694113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of particle therapy in re-irradiation of head and neck patients. Results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial.
Eekers DBP; Roelofs E; Jelen U; Kirk M; Granzier M; Ammazzalorso F; Ahn PH; Janssens GORJ; Hoebers FJP; Friedmann T; Solberg T; Walsh S; Troost EGC; Kaanders JHAM; Lambin P
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Dec; 121(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 27639891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.
Lin JF; Yeh DC; Yeh HL; Chang CF; Lin JC
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 26116150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometric and dosimetric impact of 3D generative adversarial network-based metal artifact reduction algorithm on VMAT and IMPT for the head and neck region.
Nakamura M; Nakao M; Imanishi K; Hirashima H; Tsuruta Y
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 34092240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Organ sparing potential and inter-fraction robustness of adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer.
van der Laan HP; Anakotta RM; Korevaar EW; Dieters M; Ubbels JF; Wijsman R; Sijtsema NM; Both S; Langendijk JA; Muijs CT; Knopf AC
Acta Oncol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):1775-1782. PubMed ID: 31556764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing cone-beam CT intensity correction methods for dose recalculation in adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton therapy for head and neck cancer.
Kurz C; Dedes G; Resch A; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Nijhuis R; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1651-7. PubMed ID: 26198654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
