These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25851438)
1. Model-based standardization to adjust for unmeasured cluster-level confounders with complex survey data. Cai Z; Brumback BA Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2368-80. PubMed ID: 25851438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjusting for confounding by neighborhood using generalized linear mixed models and complex survey data. Brumback BA; Zheng HW; Dailey AB Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(8):1313-24. PubMed ID: 22975990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model-based standardization using an outcome model with random effects. Wang Z; Brumback BA; Alrwisan AA; Winterstein AG Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3378-3394. PubMed ID: 31150151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conditional pseudolikelihood methods for clustered ordinal, multinomial, or count outcomes with complex survey data. Brumback BA; Cai Z; He Z; Zheng HW; Dailey AB Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(8):1325-35. PubMed ID: 22976045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjusting for unmeasured confounding due to either of two crossed factors with a logistic regression model. Li L; Brumback BA; Weppelmann TA; Morris JG; Ali A Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(18):3179-88. PubMed ID: 26892025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusting for confounding by neighborhood using a proportional odds model and complex survey data. Brumback BA; Dailey AB; Zheng HW Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(11):1133-41. PubMed ID: 22510274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efforts to adjust for confounding by neighborhood using complex survey data. Brumback BA; Dailey AB; He Z; Brumback LC; Livingston MD Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(18):1890-9. PubMed ID: 20680982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication. Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doubly robust testing and estimation of model-adjusted effect-measure modification with complex survey data. Zheng HW; Brumback BA; Lu X; Bouldin ED; Cannell MB; Andresen EM Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 22833449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data. Shardell M; Ferrucci L Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):829-846. PubMed ID: 29205454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Description of an approach based on maximum likelihood to adjust an excess hazard model with a random effect. Dupont C; Bossard N; Remontet L; Belot A Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 37(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23628129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age at first use of alcohol predicts the risk of heavy alcohol use in early adulthood: a longitudinal study in the United States. Liang W; Chikritzhs T Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Feb; 26(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 25107830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of an outcome using trajectories estimated from a linear mixed model. Maruyama N; Takahashi F; Takeuchi M J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 20183443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods of estimating or accounting for neighborhood associations with health using complex survey data. Brumback BA; Cai Z; Dailey AB Am J Epidemiol; 2014 May; 179(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 24723000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is life satisfaction hump-shaped with alcohol consumption? Evidence from Russian panel data. Massin S; Kopp P Addict Behav; 2014 Apr; 39(4):803-10. PubMed ID: 24531635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A generalized linear models approach to spatial scan statistics for covariate adjustment. Jung I Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1131-43. PubMed ID: 19177339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-stage methods for the analysis of pooled data. Stukel TA; Demidenko E; Dykes J; Karagas MR Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2115-30. PubMed ID: 11439425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stratification for confounding--part 2: direct and indirect standardization. Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 116(4):c322-5. PubMed ID: 20664287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of omitted confounders on the analysis of correlated binary data. Chao WH; Palta M; Young T Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):678-89. PubMed ID: 9192456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of group means when adjusting for covariates in generalized linear models. Qu Y; Luo J Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25406099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]