288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25851589)
1. Impacts of the Minamata convention on mercury emissions and global deposition from coal-fired power generation in Asia.
Giang A; Stokes LC; Streets DG; Corbitt ES; Selin NE
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5326-35. PubMed ID: 25851589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercury emissions and partitioning from Indian coal-fired power plants.
Agarwalla H; Senapati RN; Das TB
J Environ Sci (China); 2021 Feb; 100():28-33. PubMed ID: 33279041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in India: Possibilities and challenges.
Joy A; Qureshi A
Ambio; 2023 Jan; 52(1):242-252. PubMed ID: 35997988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Control of mercury emissions from stationary coal combustion sources in China: Current status and recommendations.
Hu Y; Cheng H
Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27596303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric mercury concentrations emitted from a coal-fired power plant in Mexico.
García GF; Álvarez HB; Echeverría RS; de Alba SR; Rueda VM; Dosantos EC; Cruz GV
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):973-985. PubMed ID: 28498787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mercury atmospheric emission, deposition and isotopic fingerprinting from major coal-fired power plants in Australia: Insights from palaeo-environmental analysis from sediment cores.
Schneider L; Rose NL; Myllyvirta L; Haberle S; Lintern A; Yuan J; Sinclair D; Holley C; Zawadzki A; Sun R
Environ Pollut; 2021 Oct; 287():117596. PubMed ID: 34426387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
Tian H; Wang Y; Cheng K; Qu Y; Hao J; Xue Z; Chai F
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 22696807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Glasgow Climate Pact and Updated Nationally Determined Contribution on Mercury Mitigation Abiding by the Minamata Convention in India.
Vishwanathan SS; Hanaoka T; Garg A
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(43):16265-16275. PubMed ID: 37863474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atmospheric mercury footprints of nations.
Liang S; Wang Y; Cinnirella S; Pirrone N
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3566-74. PubMed ID: 25723898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mercury stable isotope signatures of world coal deposits and historical coal combustion emissions.
Sun R; Sonke JE; Heimbürger LE; Belkin HE; Liu G; Shome D; Cukrowska E; Liousse C; Pokrovsky OS; Streets DG
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(13):7660-8. PubMed ID: 24905585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of mercury and chlorine content of coal on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
Zhang L; Wang S; Meng Y; Hao J
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):6385-92. PubMed ID: 22533359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emission-Limit-Oriented Strategy To Control Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in Coal-Fired Power Plants toward the Implementation of the Minamata Convention.
Wu Q; Wang S; Liu K; Li G; Hao J
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(19):11087-11093. PubMed ID: 30193461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atmospheric emissions estimation of Hg, As, and Se from coal-fired power plants in China, 2007.
Tian H; Wang Y; Xue Z; Qu Y; Chai F; Hao J
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jul; 409(16):3078-81. PubMed ID: 21621816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Burden of Disease from Rising Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions in Southeast Asia.
Koplitz SN; Jacob DJ; Sulprizio MP; Myllyvirta L; Reid C
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1467-1476. PubMed ID: 28080047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal Trend and Spatial Distribution of Speciated Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in China During 1978-2014.
Wu Q; Wang S; Li G; Liang S; Lin CJ; Wang Y; Cai S; Liu K; Hao J
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(24):13428-13435. PubMed ID: 27993067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bibliometric analysis on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants: a systematic review and future prospect.
Liu Q; Gao J; Li G; Zheng Y; Li R; Yue T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(13):19148-19165. PubMed ID: 38379043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mitigation Options of Atmospheric Hg Emissions in China.
Wu Q; Li G; Wang S; Liu K; Hao J
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 52(21):12368-12375. PubMed ID: 30285433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
