BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25851633)

  • 1. The effect of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim on survival outcomes of patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Lyman GH; Reiner M; Morrow PK; Crawford J
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1452-8. PubMed ID: 25851633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
    Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy.
    Bondarenko I; Gladkov OA; Elsaesser R; Buchner A; Bias P
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Aug; 13():386. PubMed ID: 23945072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.
    Almenar D; Mayans J; Juan O; Bueno JM; Lopez JI; Frau A; Guinot M; Cerezuela P; Buscalla EG; Gasquet JA; Sanchez J
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 May; 18(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19076208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after receipt of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in older patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Calip GS; Moran KM; Sweiss KI; Patel PR; Wu Z; Adimadhyam S; Lee TA; Ko NY; Quigley JG; Chiu BC
    Cancer; 2019 Apr; 125(7):1143-1154. PubMed ID: 30548485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review.
    Pfeil AM; Allcott K; Pettengell R; von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Szabo Z
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Feb; 23(2):525-45. PubMed ID: 25284721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): A Phase 3 study.
    Cobb PW; Moon YW; Mezei K; Láng I; Bhat G; Chawla S; Hasal SJ; Schwartzberg LS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6234-6243. PubMed ID: 32687266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
    Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to its biosimilars in terms of efficacy and safety: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in breast cancer patients.
    Botteri E; Krendyukov A; Curigliano G
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 89():49-55. PubMed ID: 29227817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
    Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.
    Rusthoven J; Bramwell V; Stephenson B
    Cancer Prev Control; 1998 Aug; 2(4):179-90. PubMed ID: 10093631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.