These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25852629)

  • 1. The processing of raising and nominal control: an eye-tracking study.
    Sturt P; Kwon N
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():331. PubMed ID: 25852629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing Control Information in a Nominal Control Construction: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Aug; 45(4):779-93. PubMed ID: 25980968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interference in the processing of adjunct control.
    Parker D; Lago S; Phillips C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1346. PubMed ID: 26441723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attraction Effects in Honorific Agreement in Korean.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1302. PubMed ID: 27630594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrieval Interference in Syntactic Processing: The Case of Reflexive Binding in English.
    Patil U; Vasishth S; Lewis RL
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():329. PubMed ID: 27303315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teasing apart retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors.
    Jäger LA; Benz L; Roeser J; Dillon BW; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():506. PubMed ID: 26106337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wh-filler-gap dependency formation guides reflexive antecedent search.
    Frazier M; Ackerman L; Baumann P; Potter D; Yoshida M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1504. PubMed ID: 26500579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling.
    Jäger LA; Engelmann F; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():617. PubMed ID: 26074829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1320. PubMed ID: 31244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Relationship Between Anaphor Features and Antecedent Retrieval: Comparing Mandarin Ziji and Ta-Ziji.
    Dillon B; Chow WY; Xiang M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1966. PubMed ID: 26779079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.
    Villata S; Tabor W; Franck J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2. PubMed ID: 29403414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: implications for retrieval strategies.
    Kush D; Phillips C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1252. PubMed ID: 25414680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attachment and Concord of Temporal Adverbs: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Biondo N; Vespignani F; Dillon B
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():983. PubMed ID: 31214065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filling Predictable and Unpredictable Gaps, with and without Similarity-Based Interference: Evidence for LIFG Effects of Dependency Processing.
    Leiken K; McElree B; Pylkkänen L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1739. PubMed ID: 26635655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Prominence and Cue Association on Retrieval Processes: A Computational Account.
    Engelmann F; Jӓger LA; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Dec; 43(12):e12800. PubMed ID: 31858626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Not All Phrases Are Equally Attractive: Experimental Evidence for Selective Agreement Attraction Effects.
    Parker D; An A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1566. PubMed ID: 30210399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Limited Role of Number of Nested Syntactic Dependencies in Accounting for Processing Cost: Evidence from German Simplex and Complex Verbal Clusters.
    Bader M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2268. PubMed ID: 29410633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-dependency and structure-dependency in number interference effects in sentence comprehension.
    Franck J; Colonna S; Rizzi L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():349. PubMed ID: 25914652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure Modulates Similarity-Based Interference in Sluicing: An Eye Tracking study.
    Harris JA
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1839. PubMed ID: 26733893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.