112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2585313)
1. Quantitative and subjective analysis of temporomandibular joint radiographs.
Smith SR; Matteson SR; Phillips C; Tyndall DA
J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 2585313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of positioning variations in transcranial radiographs of the temporomandibular joint: a laboratory study.
Gray RJ; Quayle AA; Horner K; Al-Gorashi AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Aug; 29(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 1911672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of horizontal condylar angle and x-ray projection angle on the appearance of the condyle on lateral temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.
Beloor Vasudeva S; Kameko N; Endo A; Okano T
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Dec; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 23208594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of condylar position from temporomandibular joint radiographs.
Aquilino SA; Matteson SR; Holland GA; Phillips C
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3856026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer performance in assessment of condylar position in temporomandibular joint radiograms.
Liedberg J; Rohlin M; Westesson PL
Acta Odontol Scand; 1985 Mar; 43(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3859985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms.
Pullinger A; Hollender L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Sep; 60(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 3862048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: a comparative study.
Knoernschild KL; Aquilino SA; Ruprecht A
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 1774686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical evaluation of the lateral temporomandibular joint radiograph.
Weinberg LA
J Prosthet Dent; 1984 May; 51(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 6587091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Panoramic imaging of the temporomandibular joint: an experimental study using cadaveric skulls.
Fallon SD; Fritz GW; Laskin DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 16413893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced joint distance during TMJ movement in the posterior condylar position.
Yang HJ; Kim DS; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e159-64. PubMed ID: 23465637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of the mandibular condyle.
Tyndall DA; Phillips C; Malone-Trahey A; Renner J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 2062527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A radiographic study of condyle position at various depths of cut in dry skulls with axially corrected lateral tomograms.
Pandis N; Karpac J; Trevino R; Williams B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Aug; 100(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 1867162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle.
Ekberg EC; Petersson A; Nilner M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9780901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the condyle/fossa relationship before and after prosthetic rehabilitation with maxillary complete denture and mandibular removable partial denture.
Amorim VC; Laganá DC; de Paula Eduardo JV; Zanetti AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 12806330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A transcranial radiographic examination of the temporal portion of the temporomandibular joint.
Keesler JT; Christensen LV; Donegan SJ; Austin BP
J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 1583560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transcranial radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of mandibular condyle position.
Menezes AV; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F; Ambrosano GM; Manzi FR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18606752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a submental-vertex analysis for producing quality temporomandibular joint laminagraphs.
Williamson EH; Wilson CW
Am J Orthod; 1976 Aug; 70(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 1066056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of TMJ by conventional transcranial radiography and indirect digitized images to determine condylar position in primary dentition.
Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; Haiter Neto F; Gavião MB
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2004; 28(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15163152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Landmark identification error in submentovertex cephalometrics. A computerized method for determining the condylar long axis.
Williamson PC; Major PW; Nebbe B; Glover KE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Sep; 86(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 9768429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
