These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2585323)

  • 1. A comparison of self-assessed satisfaction among wearers of dentures, hearing aids, and eyeglasses.
    Smedley TC; Friedrichsen SW; Cho MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Dec; 62(6):654-61. PubMed ID: 2585323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-assessed satisfaction levels in elderly hearing aid, eyeglass, and denture wearers. A cross-modality comparison.
    Smedley TC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Oct; 11(5 Suppl):41S-47S. PubMed ID: 2269414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new, short, specific questionnaire (QoLIP-10) for evaluating the oral health-related quality of life of implant-retained overdenture and hybrid prosthesis wearers.
    Preciado A; Del Río J; Lynch CD; Castillo-Oyagüe R
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 23831418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
    Rueff EM; Bailey MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 28343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of clinical variables on patients' satisfaction with complete dentures.
    van Waas MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 2308091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures.
    Allen PF; McMillan AS; Walshaw D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11208203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prevalence of xerostomia in patients with removable prostheses.
    Nikolopoulou F; Tasopoulos T; Jagger R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):525-6. PubMed ID: 24179964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of Patient Satisfaction with Removable Denture Renewal: A Pilot Study.
    Krausch-Hofmann S; Cuypers L; Ivanova A; Duyck J
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):509-516. PubMed ID: 27598950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of various screwed implant prostheses on oral health-related quality of life as measured with the QoLIP-10 and OHIP-14 scales: a cross-sectional study.
    Preciado A; Del Río J; Lynch CD; Castillo-Oyagüe R
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1196-207. PubMed ID: 24018463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Satisfaction with fitted hearing aids. I. An analysis of technical information.
    Kapteyn TS
    Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 929092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lined multifocal wearers prefer progressive addition lenses.
    Boroyan HJ; Cho MH; Fuller BC; Krefman RA; McDougall JH; Schaeffer JL; Tahran RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 May; 66(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 7629370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life.
    Oh SH; Kim Y; Park JY; Jung YJ; Kim SK; Park SY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e31-7. PubMed ID: 25346286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forms of vision correction: demographic factors in patient attitudes and perceptions.
    Riley C; Pence N
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Jul; 30(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 15499233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of tooth loss in a denture wearing population: an assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile.
    Allen PF; McMillan AS
    Community Dent Health; 1999 Sep; 16(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 10641078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of hearing aids and wearer satisfaction--a two year study.
    Birt BD; Alberti PW
    Can J Otolaryngol; 1975; 4(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 1182606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Hearing aid application performance evaluation questionnaire to presbycusis].
    Chen X; Zhou H; Zhang J; Wang L
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 25(4):148-50, 153. PubMed ID: 21563459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors relating to the under-use of postaural hearing aids.
    Brooks DN
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 4063557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of three bifocal contact lenses.
    Van Meter WS; Gussler JR; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 2379307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pilot evaluation of masticatory efficiency and patients' satisfaction in long-centric occlusal pattern complete denture wearers].
    Liu XH; Liu JZ; Xie QF; Kang YF; Chen W
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Feb; 45(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 23411519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.