These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25854587)

  • 1. Psychosexual Characteristics of Women Reporting Sexual Aggression Against Men.
    Carvalho J; Nobre PJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2016 Sep; 31(15):2539-55. PubMed ID: 25854587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male College Students Using Sexually Aggressive Strategies: Findings on the Interpersonal Relationship Profile.
    Carvalho J; Sá A
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Feb; 35(3-4):646-661. PubMed ID: 29294637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: an examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior.
    Yost MR; Zurbriggen EL
    J Sex Res; 2006 May; 43(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 16817063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The sexual functioning profile of a nonforensic sample of individuals reporting sexual aggression against women.
    Carvalho J; Quinta-Gomes A; Nobre PJ
    J Sex Med; 2013 Jul; 10(7):1744-54. PubMed ID: 23668395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender differences in sexual harassment and coercion in college students: developmental, individual, and situational determinants.
    Ménard KS; Hall GC; Phung AH; Ghebrial MF; Martin L
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Oct; 18(10):1222-39. PubMed ID: 19771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.
    DeGue S; DiLillo D; Scalora M
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):402-26. PubMed ID: 20693517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual aggression among Brazilian college students: prevalence of victimization and perpetration in men and women.
    D'Abreu LC; Krahé B; Bazon MR
    J Sex Res; 2013; 50(8):795-807. PubMed ID: 23050847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students.
    Hines DA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):403-22. PubMed ID: 17333324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual coercion in men and women: similar behaviors, different predictors.
    Schatzel-Murphy EA; Harris DA; Knight RA; Milburn MA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):974-86. PubMed ID: 19330440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationships among perceived peer acceptance of sexual aggression, punishment certainty, and sexually aggressive behavior.
    Strang E; Peterson ZD
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Dec; 28(18):3369-85. PubMed ID: 24014542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keyboard coercion: Online and face-to-face sexual aggression in a college sample.
    Ehman AC; Gross AM
    J Am Coll Health; 2024 Jul; 72(5):1480-1489. PubMed ID: 35658095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aggression-Related Sexual Fantasies: Prevalence Rates, Sex Differences, and Links With Personality, Attitudes, and Behavior.
    Bondü R; Birke JB
    J Sex Med; 2021 Aug; 18(8):1383-1397. PubMed ID: 34281796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Authoritarianism and sexual aggression.
    Walker WD; Rowe RC; Quinsey VL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1993 Nov; 65(5):1036-45. PubMed ID: 8246111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion among Polish college students.
    Doroszewicz K; Forbes GB
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Jan; 23(1):58-73. PubMed ID: 18087032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender differences in cognitive and affective responses to sexual coercion.
    Byers ES; Glenn SA
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Mar; 27(5):827-45. PubMed ID: 22007110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of sexual coercion in heterosexual and non-heterosexual men and women.
    VanderLaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):987-99. PubMed ID: 19219543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a Bogus Pipeline to Detect Men's Underreporting of Sexually Aggressive Behavior.
    Strang E; Peterson ZD
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Jan; 35(1-2):208-232. PubMed ID: 27920357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trajectories of male sexual aggression from adolescence through college: A latent class growth analysis.
    Swartout KM; Swartout AG; Brennan CL; White JW
    Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(5):467-77. PubMed ID: 25735916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The developmental antecedents of sexual coercion against women: testing alternative hypotheses with structural equation modeling.
    Knight RA; Sims-Knight JE
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():72-85; discussion 144-53. PubMed ID: 12839887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: the role of aggressor gender and tactics.
    Oswald DL; Russel BL
    J Sex Res; 2006 Feb; 43(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16817071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.