These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25854648)

  • 1. Using cumulative sums of martingale residuals for model checking in nested case-control studies.
    Borgan Ø; Zhang Y
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):696-703. PubMed ID: 25854648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goftte: A R package for assessing goodness-of-fit in proportional (sub) distributions hazards regression models.
    Sfumato P; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Cook RJ; Boher JM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():269-275. PubMed ID: 31319955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goodness-of-fit test for monotone proportional subdistribution hazards assumptions based on weighted residuals.
    Boher JM; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Kramar A; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):362-377. PubMed ID: 27790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models.
    Martinussen T; Aalen OO; Scheike TH
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Checking Fine and Gray subdistribution hazards model with cumulative sums of residuals.
    Li J; Scheike TH; Zhang MJ
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(2):197-217. PubMed ID: 25421251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Aalen's additive and Cox proportional hazards models for breast cancer survival: analysis of population- based data from British Columbia, Canada.
    Abadi A; Saadat S; Yavari P; Bajdik C; Jalili P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3113-6. PubMed ID: 22393999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model checks for Cox-type regression models based on optimally weighted martingale residuals.
    Gandy A; Jensen U
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Dec; 15(4):534-57. PubMed ID: 19507026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Checking the linear transformation model for clustered failure time observations.
    Hattori S
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Sep; 14(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 18240021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual-based model diagnosis methods for mixture cure models.
    Peng Y; Taylor JMG
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):495-505. PubMed ID: 27598783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum likelihood estimation for Cox's regression model under nested case-control sampling.
    Scheike TH; Juul A
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 15054025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.
    Geskus RB
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20377575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Checking a semiparametric additive risk model.
    Gandy A; Jensen U
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2005 Dec; 11(4):451-72. PubMed ID: 16328571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partly functional temporal process regression with semiparametric profile estimating functions.
    Yan J; Huang J
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 18547299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of Clinical Cohort Data Using Nested Case-control and Case-cohort Sampling Designs. A Powerful and Economical Tool.
    Ohneberg K; Wolkewitz M; Beyersmann J; Palomar-Martinez M; Olaechea-Astigarraga P; Alvarez-Lerma F; Schumacher M
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(6):505-14. PubMed ID: 26108707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing goodness-of-fit for the proportional hazards model based on nested case-control data.
    Lu W; Liu M; Chen YH
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 25298193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic plots to reveal functional form for covariates in multiplicative intensity models.
    Grambsch PM; Therneau TM; Fleming TR
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1469-82. PubMed ID: 8589234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals.
    Lin DY; Wei LJ; Ying Z
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11890304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Residuals for proportional hazards models with interval-censored survival data.
    Farrington CP
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 10877306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalized mean residual life models for case-cohort and nested case-control studies.
    Jin P; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Liu M
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2020 Oct; 26(4):789-819. PubMed ID: 32529421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goodness of fit tests for estimating equations based on pseudo-observations.
    Pavlič K; Martinussen T; Andersen PK
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):189-205. PubMed ID: 29488163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.