BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25855075)

  • 1. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
    Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
    Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
    Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
    Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
    Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Ghetti C
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1199-207. PubMed ID: 19472626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Lell M; Böhner C; Bautz WA; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17136645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of scatter effects on image quality for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Boone JM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4425-32. PubMed ID: 19928073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.