These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25857283)
21. Morphological features of the mandible as predictors for neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Verweij JP; Mensink G; Fiocco M; van Merkesteyn JP J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1710-5. PubMed ID: 26343205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient discomfort and other side effects after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial. Baas EM; van Gemert BP; Bierenbroodspot F; Milstein DM; de Lange J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1119-24. PubMed ID: 26099918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of intraoperative positioning of the inferior alveolar nerve on postoperative paresthesia after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: prospective clinical study. Hanzelka T; Foltán R; Pavlíková G; Horká E; Sedý J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(9):901-6. PubMed ID: 21570811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Kuroyanagi N; Miyachi H; Ochiai S; Kamiya N; Kanazawa T; Nagao T; Shimozato K Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 42(7):814-22. PubMed ID: 23265759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion. Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle. Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques. Nooh N; Abdullah WA; El-Awady Grawish M; Ramalingam S; Hassan G; Javed F; Al-Hezaimi K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23810515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the Transverse Displacement of the Proximal Segment After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Different Lingual Split Patterns and Advancement Amounts Using the Finite Element Method. Dai Z; Hou M; Ma W; Song DL; Zhang CX; Zhou WY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2286.e1-2286.e11. PubMed ID: 27542550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibula performed with separators: a multi-centre prospective study. Mensink G; Zweers A; Wolterbeek R; Dicker GG; Groot RH; van Merkesteyn RJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 22440316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors influencing neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: retrospective analysis after 6 and 12 months. Bruckmoser E; Bulla M; Alacamlioglu Y; Steiner I; Watzke IM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Apr; 115(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 23182371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Concomitant removal of mandibular third molars during sagittal split osteotomy minimizes neurosensory dysfunction. Doucet JC; Morrison AD; Davis BR; Robertson CG; Goodday R; Precious DS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2153-63. PubMed ID: 22079060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The neurosensory deficit of inferior alveolar nerve following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a prospective study. Hanfesh A; Salma RG; Al Mutairi K; AlShiha SK; Al Otaibi S Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 26(3):401-415. PubMed ID: 34510239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction. Choi JY; Hwang KG; Baek SH; Lee JH; Kim TW; Kim MJ; Chang YI J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 29(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11465256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance. Schlund M; Grall P; Ferri J; Nicot R Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 60(8):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 35606209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasonic and Conventional Surgery on the Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy. Kokuryo S; Habu M; Kita R; Katsuki T; Tominaga K; Yoshioka I J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 29406261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better? Ow AT; Cheung LK Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nerve manipulation during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy increases neurosensory disturbance and decreases patient satisfaction. Kuhlefelt M; Laine P; Suominen AL; Lindqvist C; Thorén H J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):2052.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25234537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions. Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Neurosensory Disturbances After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Piezoelectric Surgery: A Systematic Review. Rude K; Svensson P; Starch-Jensen T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 77(2):380-390. PubMed ID: 30055164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]