These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25857456)
1. A midstream urine collector is not a good alternative to a sterile collection method during the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Verliat-Guinaud J; Blanc P; Garnier F; Gajdos V; Guigonis V Acta Paediatr; 2015 Sep; 104(9):e395-400. PubMed ID: 25857456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. LaRocco MT; Franek J; Leibach EK; Weissfeld AS; Kraft CS; Sautter RL; Baselski V; Rodahl D; Peterson EJ; Cornish NE Clin Microbiol Rev; 2016 Jan; 29(1):105-47. PubMed ID: 26598386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contamination rates of different methods of urine culture collection in children: A retrospective cohort study. Guri A; Hurvitz Florenthal M; Scheier E; Mahlab-Guri K; Balla U J Paediatr Child Health; 2021 Aug; 57(8):1281-1287. PubMed ID: 33760325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The method of urine sampling is not a valid predictor for vesicoureteral reflux in children after febrile urinary tract infections. Haid B; Roesch J; Strasser C; Oswald J J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):500.e1-500.e5. PubMed ID: 28412102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contamination in Adult Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Lough ME; Shradar E; Hsieh C; Hedlin H J Emerg Nurs; 2019 Sep; 45(5):488-501. PubMed ID: 31445626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Perineal bag versus urethral catheterization of suprapubic aspiration for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in infants in emergency units]. Martín Puerto MJ; Cela de Julián ME; Mendoza Soto A; Sánchez del Pozo J; Ramos Amador JT An Esp Pediatr; 1999 May; 50(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 10394180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children. Karacan C; Erkek N; Senel S; Akin Gunduz S; Catli G; Tavil B Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 20357500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contamination rates of different urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in young children: an observational cohort study. Tosif S; Baker A; Oakley E; Donath S; Babl FE J Paediatr Child Health; 2012 Aug; 48(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 22537082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urine collection methods used for non-toilet-trained children in pediatric emergency departments in France: A medical practice analysis. Cousin E; Ryckewaert A; de Jorna Lecouvey C; Arnaud AP Arch Pediatr; 2019 Jan; 26(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 30554850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liquid gold: the cost-effectiveness of urine sample collection methods for young precontinent children. Kaufman J; Knight AJ; Bryant PA; Babl FE; Dalziel K Arch Dis Child; 2020 Mar; 105(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 31444211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performing a urine dipstick test with a clean-catch urine sample is an accurate screening method for urinary tract infections in young infants. Herreros ML; Tagarro A; García-Pose A; Sánchez A; Cañete A; Gili P Acta Paediatr; 2018 Jan; 107(1):145-150. PubMed ID: 28940750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moving from bag to catheter for urine collection in non-toilet-trained children suspected of having urinary tract infection: a paired comparison of urine cultures. Etoubleau C; Reveret M; Brouet D; Badier I; Brosset P; Fourcade L; Bahans C; Garnier F; Blanc P; Guigonis V J Pediatr; 2009 Jun; 154(6):803-6. PubMed ID: 19375715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tests for the diagnosis and investigation of urinary tract infection in children: a systematic review and economic model. Whiting P; Westwood M; Bojke L; Palmer S; Richardson G; Cooper J; Watt I; Glanville J; Sculpher M; Kleijnen J Health Technol Assess; 2006 Oct; 10(36):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-154. PubMed ID: 17014747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urine collection methods and dipstick testing in non-toilet-trained children. Diviney J; Jaswon MS Pediatr Nephrol; 2021 Jul; 36(7):1697-1708. PubMed ID: 32918601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Culture Obtained by Stimulation Technique versus Catheter Specimen Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infections in Newborns: A Paired Comparison of Urine Collection Methods. Altuntas N; Alan B Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(4):326-331. PubMed ID: 31665720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. To clean or not to clean: effect on contamination rates in midstream urine collections in toilet-trained children. Vaillancourt S; McGillivray D; Zhang X; Kramer MS Pediatrics; 2007 Jun; 119(6):e1288-93. PubMed ID: 17502345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of bladder stimulation as a non-invasive technique for urine collection to diagnose urinary tract infection in infants under 6 months: a randomized multicenter study ("EE-Sti.Ve.N"). Demonchy D; Ciais C; Fontas E; Berard E; Bréaud J; Rohrlich PS; Dubos F; Fortier C; Desmontils J; Hérisse AL; Donzeau D; Haas H; Tran A Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):783. PubMed ID: 31881992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Urine samples from disposable diapers: an accurate method for urine cultures. Cohen HA; Woloch B; Linder N; Vardi A; Barzilai A J Fam Pract; 1997 Mar; 44(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 9071249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]