152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25857518)
1. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses--a simulation study.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Misztal I
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 25857518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Lawlor TJ; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4090-4. PubMed ID: 25864050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.
Nilforooshan MA; Lee M
J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1090-1100. PubMed ID: 30624671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.
Misztal I; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3943-52. PubMed ID: 24679933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models.
Strandén I; Matilainen K; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 28508482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multitrait genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein cattle.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Gordo D; Difford GF; Løvendahl P; Lassen J
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9195-9206. PubMed ID: 32747097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.
Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
