598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25857748)
21. Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
Li MH; Li YD; Tan HQ; Gu BX; Chen YC; Wang W; Chen SW; Hu DJ
Neurology; 2011 Aug; 77(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 21775735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surveillance imaging after intracranial stent implantation: non-invasive imaging compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Golshani B; Lazzaro MA; Raslau F; Darkhabani Z; Baruah D; Eastwood D; Fitzsimmons BF; Zaidat OO
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Jul; 5(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22641863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Follow-up after embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective comparison of two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.
Serafin Z; Strześniewski P; Lasek W; Beuth W
Neuroradiology; 2012 Nov; 54(11):1253-60. PubMed ID: 22488210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.
Majoie CB; Sprengers ME; van Rooij WJ; Lavini C; Sluzewski M; van Rijn JC; den Heeten GJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005; 26(6):1349-56. PubMed ID: 15956496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of visceral arterial aneurysms after coil embolization.
Iryo Y; Ikushima I; Hirai T; Yonenaga K; Yamashita Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jun; 54(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 23436827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Gauvrit JY; Leclerc X; Caron S; Taschner CA; Lejeune JP; Pruvo JP
Stroke; 2006 Apr; 37(4):1033-7. PubMed ID: 16528000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR-angiography as a method for evaluating endovascular coiled cerebral aneurysms.
Poncyljusz W; Czechowski J; Corr P; Falkowski A; Rać ME
Med Sci Monit; 2007 May; 13 Suppl 1():59-64. PubMed ID: 17507887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.
van Amerongen MJ; Boogaarts HD; de Vries J; Verbeek AL; Meijer FJ; Prokop M; Bartels RH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Sep; 35(9):1655-61. PubMed ID: 24008171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images.
Cho YD; Kim KM; Lee WJ; Sohn CH; Kang HS; Kim JE; Han MH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24497808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography.
Yamada N; Hayashi K; Murao K; Higashi M; Iihara K
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Aug; 25(7):1154-7. PubMed ID: 15313700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Boulin A; Pierot L
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 11274544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device.
Timsit C; Soize S; Benaissa A; Portefaix C; Gauvrit JY; Pierot L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 27102311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms using zTE MRA as compared with TOF MRA: a preliminary image quality study.
Shang S; Ye J; Luo X; Qu J; Zhen Y; Wu J
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4271-4280. PubMed ID: 28382536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is digital substraction angiography still needed for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by embolisation with detachable coils?
Lubicz B; Neugroschl C; Collignon L; François O; Balériaux D
Neuroradiology; 2008 Oct; 50(10):841-8. PubMed ID: 18795274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usefulness of Silent Magnetic Resonance Angiography in the Follow-Up of Endovascular-Treated Intracranial Aneurysm: A Prospective Study.
Tan S; Lu Y; Li B; Wu Q; Zhou X; Wang Y
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2022 Feb; 31(2):106256. PubMed ID: 34923434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms.
Cirillo M; Scomazzoni F; Cirillo L; Cadioli M; Simionato F; Iadanza A; Kirchin M; Righi C; Anzalone N
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e853-9. PubMed ID: 24103356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultra-High-Resolution Time-of-Flight MR-Angiography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms, Alternative to Preinterventional DSA?
Schubert T; Husain HS; Thurner P; Madjidyar J; Barnaure I; Piccirelli M; Klarhöfer M; Schmidt M; Speier P; Forman C; Kulcsar Z
Clin Neuroradiol; 2023 Dec; 33(4):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 37401949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Enhanced vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diversion.
Quan T; Ren Y; Li J; Fu X; Jin Y; Ran Y; Guan S; Cheng J; Xu H
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):833-841. PubMed ID: 37580600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Added diagnostic values of three-dimensional high-resolution proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the circle-of-Willis: Comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.
Yim Y; Jung SC; Kim JY; Kim SO; Kim BJ; Lee DH; Park W; Park JC; Ahn JS
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243235. PubMed ID: 33270756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
