153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25857998)
1. Along came a spider who sat down beside her: Perceived predation risk, but not female age, affects female mate choosiness.
Atwell A; Wagner WE
Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():143-8. PubMed ID: 25857998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Condition dependence of female choosiness in a field cricket.
Judge KA; Ting JJ; Gwynne DT
J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2529-40. PubMed ID: 25288123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.
Charalabidis A; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX; Petit S; Bohan DA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187167. PubMed ID: 29121652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative importance of different direct benefits in the mate choices of a field cricket.
Wagner WE; Basolo AL
Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 17348924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female field crickets incur increased parasitism risk when near preferred song.
Martin CM; Wagner WE
PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9592. PubMed ID: 20231888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guarding males protect females from predation in a wild insect.
Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Tregenza T
Curr Biol; 2011 Oct; 21(20):1716-9. PubMed ID: 21982592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Black widows as plastic wallflowers: female choosiness increases with indicators of high mate availability in a natural population.
Scott CE; McCann S; Andrade MCB
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):8981. PubMed ID: 32488193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait.
Hunt J; Brooks R; Jennions MD
Am Nat; 2005 Jul; 166(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 15937791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False promises: females spurn cheating males in a field cricket.
Wagner WE; Smith AR; Basolo AL
Biol Lett; 2007 Aug; 3(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 17567551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic experience shapes alternative mating tactics and reproductive investment in male field crickets.
Bailey NW; Gray B; Zuk M
Curr Biol; 2010 May; 20(9):845-9. PubMed ID: 20417103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
Candolin U; Salesto T
Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mothers forewarn offspring about predators: a transgenerational maternal effect on behavior.
Storm JJ; Lima SL
Am Nat; 2010 Mar; 175(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 20109061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of predation risk on mate signaling and mate choice in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella.
Edomwande C; Barbosa F
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):524. PubMed ID: 31949273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution.
Hedrick AV
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Apr; 267(1444):671-5. PubMed ID: 10821611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
Etienne L; Rousset F; Godelle B; Courtiol A
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140190. PubMed ID: 24789896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk.
Kim TW; Christy JH; Dennenmoser S; Choe JC
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 276(1657):775-80. PubMed ID: 19019792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservation of multivariate female preference functions and preference mechanisms in three species of trilling field crickets.
Blankers T; Hennig RM; Gray DA
J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):630-41. PubMed ID: 25661511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
