These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25858220)

  • 1. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Arias A; Brizuela A; Garikano X; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26386482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoral Digital Impressions for Virtual Occlusal Records: Section Quantity and Dimensions.
    Solaberrieta E; Garmendia A; Brizuela A; Otegi JR; Pradies G; Szentpétery A
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7173824. PubMed ID: 26881226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction with the dental articulator position method].
    Li LL; Zhao YJ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 32071477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of dental collisions and occlusal dynamics in the virtual environment.
    Stavness IK; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Zhang X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 26685912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complete assessment of occlusal dynamics and establishment of a digital workflow by using target tracking with a three-dimensional facial scanner.
    Kim JE; Park JH; Moon HS; Shim JS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 30446410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. InLab and Cerec Connect: virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts--an in vitro study.
    Nemli SK; Wolfart S; Reich S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 22930945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner.
    Kihara T; Yoshimi Y; Taji T; Murayama T; Tanimoto K; Nikawa H
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 26378085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations.
    Iwaki Y; Wakabayashi N; Igarashi Y
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23092147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct transfer of the position of digitized casts to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Etxaniz O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jun; 109(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 23763787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.