115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25858772)
1. Dosimetric impact of setup accuracy for an electron breast boost technique.
Davidson S; Kirsner S; Mason B; Kisling K; Barrett RD; Bonetati A; Ballo MT
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(5):e499-e504. PubMed ID: 25858772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study of cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for prone accelerated partial breast irradiation.
Jozsef G; DeWyngaert JK; Becker SJ; Lymberis S; Formenti SC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):568-74. PubMed ID: 21570210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Feng CH; Gerry E; Chmura SJ; Hasan Y; Al-Hallaq HA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 25442344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Actual target coverage after setup verification using surgical clips compared with external skin markers in postoperative breast cancer radiation therapy.
van der Salm A; Murrer L; Steenbakkers I; Houben R; Boersma LJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(6):e369-e376. PubMed ID: 28666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Lumpectomy Cavity Changes on Planning Dose in Breast Radiotherapy Boost.
Lee G; Parmar H; Li W; Shessel A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 31176440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planning the breast boost: comparison of three techniques and evolution of tumor bed during treatment.
Hepel JT; Evans SB; Hiatt JR; Price LL; DiPetrillo T; Wazer DE; MacAusland SG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jun; 74(2):458-63. PubMed ID: 19084347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast boost: are we missing the target?
Benda RK; Yasuda G; Sethi A; Gabram SG; Hinerman RW; Mendenhall NP
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 97(4):905-9. PubMed ID: 12569589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of setup error in supine breast radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography.
Batumalai V; Holloway L; Delaney GP
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 27311516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of the dosimetric impact of daily setup variations measured with cone-beam CT on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer delivered in the prone position.
Xiao A; Jutzy J; Hubert G; Edens M; Washington M; Hasan Y; Chmura SJ; Al-Hallaq HA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):146-154. PubMed ID: 33124774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A topology-based method to mitigate the dosimetric uncertainty caused by the positional variation of the boost volume in breast conservative radiotherapy.
Lee PY; Lin CY; Chen SW; Chien CR; Chu CN; Hsu HT; Liang JA; Lin YJ; Shiau AC
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):55. PubMed ID: 28320428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary results on setup precision of prone-lateral patient positioning for whole breast irradiation.
Veldeman L; Speleers B; Bakker M; Jacobs F; Coghe M; De Gersem W; Impens A; Nechelput S; De Wagter C; Van den Broecke R; Villeirs G; De Neve W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Sep; 78(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 20137868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of planned versus actual dose delivered for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation using cone-beam CT and deformable registration.
Hasan Y; Kim L; Wloch J; Chi Y; Liang J; Martinez A; Yan D; Vicini F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1473-6. PubMed ID: 20656415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The lateral decubitus breast boost: description, rationale, and efficacy.
Ludwig MS; McNeese MD; Buchholz TA; Perkins GH; Strom EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jan; 76(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 19394161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the residual error in soft tissue setup in patients undergoing partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Fatunase T; Wang Z; Yoo S; Hubbs JL; Prosnitz RG; Yin FF; Marks LB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1025-34. PubMed ID: 17892919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation.
Mulliez T; Gulyban A; Vercauteren T; van Greveling A; Speleers B; De Neve W; Veldeman L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Apr; 192(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 26864048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there an advantage to delivering breast boost in the lateral decubitus position?
Kannan N; Kabolizadeh P; Kim H; Houser C; Beriwal S
Radiat Oncol; 2012 Sep; 7():163. PubMed ID: 23006598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results.
Topolnjak R; Sonke JJ; Nijkamp J; Rasch C; Minkema D; Remeijer P; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(4):1235-43. PubMed ID: 20472368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positioning accuracy during VMAT of gynecologic malignancies and the resulting dosimetric impact by a 6-degree-of-freedom couch in combination with daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography.
Yao L; Zhu L; Wang J; Liu L; Zhou S; Jiang S; Cao Q; Qu A; Tian S
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():104. PubMed ID: 25927659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image guidance during head-and-neck cancer radiation therapy: analysis of alignment trends with in-room cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Zumsteg Z; DeMarco J; Lee SP; Steinberg ML; Lin CS; McBride W; Lin K; Wang PC; Kupelian P; Lee P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):712-9. PubMed ID: 22099037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients: surgical clips as surrogate for breast excision cavity.
Topolnjak R; de Ruiter P; Remeijer P; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C; Rasch C; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(3):e187-95. PubMed ID: 21345615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
