These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25859100)

  • 41. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
    Patil SM; Kamble VB; Desai RG; Arabbi KC; Prakash V
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC84-7. PubMed ID: 26436055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.
    Ahluwalia P; Chopra S; Thomas AM
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 22565516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A novel hyperbranched poly(acrylic acid) for improved resin-modified glass-ionomer restoratives.
    Zhao J; Xie D
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 21377199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties.
    Moshaverinia A; Ansari S; Movasaghi Z; Billington RW; Darr JA; Rehman IU
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1381-90. PubMed ID: 18433855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements.
    Galun EA; Saleh N; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 7990049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.
    Yap AU; Pek YS; Cheang P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Study on fatigue toughness of dental materials. 1. Compressive strength on various luting cements and composite resin cores].
    Miyamoto S; Takagawa T; Nozaki A; Yanaka N; Nakamura Y; Imai Y; Noguchi S; Hanamura N
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):966-76. PubMed ID: 2489748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of the incorporation of hydroxyapatite on the diametral tensile strength of conventional and hybrid glass ionomer cements.
    Mederos M; Cuevas-Suarez CE; Sanchez W; Miranda P; Francia A; Pardo H; Villanueva-Stark JP; Kreiner M; Grazioli G
    Odontology; 2021 Oct; 109(4):904-911. PubMed ID: 34114136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Sep; 10(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 11641841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of titanium-reinforced composites.
    Cohen BI; Deutsch AS; Condos S; Musikant BL; Scherer W
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4 Suppl():50-5. PubMed ID: 1298327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material.
    Levartovsky S; Kuyinu E; Georgescu M; Goldstein GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):481-5. PubMed ID: 7844747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of time on the diametral tensile strength of resin-modified restorative glass ionomer cements and compomer.
    Cefaly DF; Valarelli FP; Seabra BG; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11696919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of cement type and mixing on the bi-axial fracture strength of cemented aluminous core porcelain discs.
    Fleming GJ; Narayan O
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jan; 19(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 12498899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Physical properties and comparative strength of a bioactive luting cement.
    Jefferies S; Lööf J; Pameijer CH; Boston D; Galbraith C; Hermansson L
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34 Spec No 8():8-14. PubMed ID: 24568170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Comparative Study of the Retentive Strengths of Commercial and Indigenously Developed Luting Cements using Both Lathe-cut and Clinically Simulated Specimens.
    Mathew J; Kurian BP; Philip B; Mohammed S; Menon P; Raj RS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):663-9. PubMed ID: 27659085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relationship between the strength of glass ionomers and their adhesive strength to metals.
    Hibino Y; Kuramochi K; Hoshino T; Moriyama A; Watanabe Y; Nakajima H
    Dent Mater; 2002 Nov; 18(7):552-7. PubMed ID: 12191669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.