219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25859528)
1. Knowledge and attitudes of general dental practitioners towards posterior composite restorations in northern saudi arabia.
Akbar I
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Feb; 9(2):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 25859528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward esthetically and biomechanically reliable anterior resin composite restorations: Current clinical experiences among dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia.
Almulhim KS; AlSheikh R; Abdalla M; Haridy R; Bugshan A; Smith S; Zeeshan M; Elgezawi M
F1000Res; 2023; 12():359. PubMed ID: 37811197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
Lynch CD; Wilson NH
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a Clinically Reliable Class II Resin Composite Restoration: A Cross-Sectional Study into the Current Clinical Practice among Dentists in Saudi Arabia.
AlSheikh R; Almulhim KS; Abdulkader M; Haridy R; Bugshan AS; Aldamanhouri R; Elgezawi M
Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():2691376. PubMed ID: 35959095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Study of Dental Practitioners in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Awad MM; Alradan M; Alshalan N; Alqahtani A; Alhalabi F; Salem MA; Rabah A; Alrahlah A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
De Moor R; Delmé K
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of restoring endodontically treated teeth by dentists in north of saudi arabia.
Akbar I
Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2015 Jan; 9(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 25901132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. State-of-the-art techniques in operative dentistry: contemporary teaching of posterior composites in UK and Irish dental schools.
Lynch CD; Frazier KB; McConnell RJ; Blum IR; Wilson NH
Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 20706252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
Alkhudhairy F
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restoration Strategies of Endodontically Treated Teeth among Dental Practitioners in Saudi Arabia. A Nationwide Pilot Survey.
Alenzi A; Samran A; Samran A; Nassani MZ; Naseem M; Khurshid Z; Özcan M
Dent J (Basel); 2018 Sep; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 30177593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth.
Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
