These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2586001)
1. [Indentation of the cornea and tonometry. Registration of the T-forces]. Stepanik J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Oct; 195(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 2586001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Indentation of the cornea and tonometry. Preliminary results]. Stepanik J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Apr; 184(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 6727264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new noncontact tonometer using corneal photoelasticity: porcine eye study. Hwang H; Kim M; Park C Ophthalmic Res; 2011; 45(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 20948240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of the corneal thickness in non-contact tonometry]. Gräf M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Sep; 199(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 1753670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients]. Schlote T; Landenberger H Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element based mechanical models of the cornea for pressure and indenter loading. Vito RP; Carnell PH Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 1591210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Investigation of the biomechanical properties of the cornea by bidirectional applanation: new approaches to interpreting the results]. Avetisov SE; Novikov IA; Bubnova IA; Antonov AA; Siplivyĭ VI Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 19062553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes. Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The coats of the eyeball and the intraocular pressure (author's transl)]. Stepanik J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Jan; 166(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1117642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The elasticity and rigidity of the outer coats of the eye. Asejczyk-Widlicka M; Pierscionek BK Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 92(10):1415-8. PubMed ID: 18815423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The corneal indentation and intraocular pressure in impression tonometry]. Stepanik J Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1968; 176(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 5303447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new sensor for pneumatic tonometry. Construction and working principle. Tonjum AM Acta Ophthalmol Suppl; 1973; 120():12-9. PubMed ID: 4359344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]