These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25861929)

  • 21. Microbial DNA profiling by multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for forensic comparison of soil and the influence of sample condition.
    Macdonald LM; Singh BK; Thomas N; Brewer MJ; Campbell CD; Dawson LA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 105(3):813-21. PubMed ID: 18429978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments.
    Steffan RJ; Goksøyr J; Bej AK; Atlas RM
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1988 Dec; 54(12):2908-15. PubMed ID: 2851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two bacterial DNA extraction methods from non-polluted and polluted soils.
    Mazziotti M; Henry S; Laval-Gilly P; Bonnefoy A; Falla J
    Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2018 Jan; 63(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 28667598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Soil microbial community analysis using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the bacterial ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions.
    Jones CM; Thies JE
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 May; 69(2):256-67. PubMed ID: 17343936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DNA extraction procedure: a critical issue for bacterial diversity assessment in marine sediments.
    Luna GM; Dell'Anno A; Danovaro R
    Environ Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):308-20. PubMed ID: 16423017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bacterial diversity of soils assessed by DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP fingerprints of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments: do the different methods provide similar results?
    Smalla K; Oros-Sichler M; Milling A; Heuer H; Baumgarte S; Becker R; Neuber G; Kropf S; Ulrich A; Tebbe CC
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Jun; 69(3):470-9. PubMed ID: 17407797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel strategy to extract specific phylogenetic sequence information from community T-RFLP.
    Widmer F; Hartmann M; Frey B; Kölliker R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Sep; 66(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 16564584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method suitable for DNA extraction from humus-rich soil.
    Miao T; Gao S; Jiang S; Kan G; Liu P; Wu X; An Y; Yao S
    Biotechnol Lett; 2014 Nov; 36(11):2223-8. PubMed ID: 24980851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Lysis Methods for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA for Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiota.
    Gill C; van de Wijgert JH; Blow F; Darby AC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163148. PubMed ID: 27643503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toxicity of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on soil microbial communities: implications for nutrient cycling in soil.
    Rodrigues DF; Jaisi DP; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):625-33. PubMed ID: 23205469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An efficient and economical method for extraction of DNA amenable to biotechnological manipulations, from diverse soils and sediments.
    Sharma S; Sharma KK; Kuhad RC
    J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 116(4):923-33. PubMed ID: 24329912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Objective criteria to assess representativity of soil fungal community profiles.
    Schwarzenbach K; Enkerli J; Widmer F
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Feb; 68(2):358-66. PubMed ID: 17084474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil.
    Bürgmann H; Pesaro M; Widmer F; Zeyer J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2001 May; 45(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 11295193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of primer selection and restriction enzymes to assess bacterial community diversity in an agricultural soil used for potato production via terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.
    Fortuna AM; Marsh TL; Honeycutt CW; Halteman WA
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 91(4):1193-202. PubMed ID: 21667276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The yield and quality of cellular and bacterial DNA extracts from human oral rinse samples are variably affected by the cell lysis methodology.
    Sohrabi M; Nair RG; Samaranayake LP; Zhang L; Zulfiker AH; Ahmetagic A; Good D; Wei MQ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Mar; 122():64-72. PubMed ID: 26812577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparison of total microbial DNA extraction methods from solid-culture of Zhenjiang vinegar].
    Ni Z; Xu W; Dou W; Xu H; Xu Z
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2010 Jan; 50(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 20344950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Method for rapid DNA extraction from bacterial communities of different soils].
    Zaporozhenko EV; Slobodova NV; Bulygina ES; Kravchenko IK; Kuznetsov BB
    Mikrobiologiia; 2006; 75(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16579454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Quantitative isolation of microbial DNA from the different types of soils of natural and agricultural ecosystems].
    Blagodatskaia EV; Blagodatskiĭ SA; Anderson TH
    Mikrobiologiia; 2003; 72(6):840-6. PubMed ID: 14768553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple profiling of soil microbial communities identifies potential genetic markers of metal-enriched sewage sludge.
    Macdonald CA; Campbell CD; Bacon JR; Singh BK
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 65(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 18631175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.
    Scupham AJ; Jones JA; Wesley IV
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 17241345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.