These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25862516)
1. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment. Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician? Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Physician-Patient Communication in Online Health Communities on Patient Compliance: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Lu X; Zhang R J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e12891. PubMed ID: 31094342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians. Burkle CM; Keegan MT BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():416. PubMed ID: 26410383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors. Schulz PJ; Rothenfluh F J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e14134. PubMed ID: 32250275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients. Tates K; Antheunis ML; Kanters S; Nieboer TE; Gerritse MB J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e421. PubMed ID: 29263017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study. Sehgal NKR; Rader B; Brownstein JS J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e51672. PubMed ID: 39074363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study. Emmert M; Meier F; Pisch F; Sander U J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e187. PubMed ID: 23985220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study. Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of media type on shared decision processes in third-age populations. Reychav I; Najami I; Raban DR; McHaney R; Azuri J Int J Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 112():45-58. PubMed ID: 29500021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire. Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Patel S; Cain R; Neailey K; Hooberman L J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jul; 20(7):e243. PubMed ID: 30045831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. Lagu T; Hannon NS; Rothberg MB; Lindenauer PK J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Sep; 25(9):942-6. PubMed ID: 20464523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities. McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons. Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China. Hao H J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis. Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Han X; Li B; Zhang T; Qu J J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14417. PubMed ID: 32496198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]