These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25862989)

  • 21. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Reciprocity and identity protection: reasons for rejection in the ultimatum game].
    Horita Y; Yamagishi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Oct; 78(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 18027592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.
    Wu Y; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Dec; 88(2-3):253-62. PubMed ID: 21889968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heartbeat and economic decisions: observing mental stress among proposers and responders in the ultimatum bargaining game.
    Dulleck U; Schaffner M; Torgler B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108218. PubMed ID: 25247817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fairness evolution in the ultimatum game is a function of reward size.
    Härdling R
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):720-4. PubMed ID: 17350654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bargaining in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The effect of cost, amount of gift, reciprocity, and communication.
    Bueno-Guerra N; Völter CJ; de Las Heras Á; Colell M; Call J
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 Nov; 133(4):542-550. PubMed ID: 31246048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.
    Kubota JT; Li J; Bar-David E; Banaji MR; Phelps EA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2498-504. PubMed ID: 24121413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: a preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noël X; Ermer E; Dabiri D; Verbanck P; Kornreich C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Dec; 133(2):772-5. PubMed ID: 24021763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fair play doesn't matter: MEP modulation as a neurophysiological signature of status quo bias in economic interactions.
    Pisoni A; Lo Gerfo E; Ottone S; Ponzano F; Zarri L; Vergallito A; Romero Lauro LJ
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():150-8. PubMed ID: 24983714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans.
    Takahashi T; Ikeda K; Hasegawa T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Oct; 28(5):662-5. PubMed ID: 17984929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Power and fairness in a generalized ultimatum game.
    Ciampaglia GL; Lozano S; Helbing D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99039. PubMed ID: 24905349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examination of social decision making in patients with schizophrenia using ultimatum game.
    Patil VA; Jacob AA; Chacko DM; Chakrabarti D; Devi P; Thonse U; Kumar V; Varambally S; Venkatasubramanian G; Rao NP
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2020 Apr; 50():101937. PubMed ID: 32109802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Empathy leads to fairness.
    Page KM; Nowak MA
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Nov; 64(6):1101-16. PubMed ID: 12508533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Observed Altruism in Dental Students: An Experiment Using the Ultimatum Game.
    Crutchfield PAS; Jarvis JS; Olson TL; Wilson MS
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Nov; 81(11):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29093143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.