185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2586373)
1. A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
McCollough CH; Van Lysel MS; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 2586373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Energy subtraction angiography is comparable to digital subtraction angiography in terms of iodine Rose SNR.
Burton CS; Mayo JR; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5925. PubMed ID: 27806612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A theoretical comparison of x-ray angiographic image quality using energy-dependent and conventional subtraction methods.
Tanguay J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22225282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
Van Lysel MS
Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive noise reduction for dual-energy x-ray imaging based on spatial variations in beam attenuation.
Romadanov I; Sattarivand M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245023. PubMed ID: 32554889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography of the Lower Extremity Runoff: Impact of Noise-Optimized Virtual Monochromatic Imaging on Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy.
Wichmann JL; Gillott MR; De Cecco CN; Mangold S; Varga-Szemes A; Yamada R; Otani K; Canstein C; Fuller SR; Vogl TJ; Todoran TM; Schoepf UJ
Invest Radiol; 2016 Feb; 51(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 26561048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Work in progress: the application of temporal filtering techniques to hybrid subtraction in digital subtraction angiography.
Riederer SJ; Brody WR; Enzmann DR; Hall AL; Maier JK
Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):859-62. PubMed ID: 6342036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise reduction methods for hybrid subtraction.
Nishimura DG; Macovski A; Brody WR
Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 6377031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing Iodine Contrast-to-Noise Ratios in Abdominal CT Imaging through Use of Energy Domain Noise Reduction and Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT.
Leng S; Yu L; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):562-70. PubMed ID: 25860839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the image quality in computed tomographic pulmonary angiography with dual-energy subtraction: a new application of spectral computed tomography.
Bai A; Sun Y; Qi L; Yang Y; Hua Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 24045247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photon counting x-ray imaging with K-edge filtered x-rays: A simulation study.
Atak H; Shikhaliev PM
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1385-400. PubMed ID: 26936723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined iterative reconstruction and image-domain decomposition for dual energy CT using total-variation regularization.
Dong X; Niu T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051909. PubMed ID: 24784388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the hepatic veins in poor contrast conditions using dual energy CT: evaluation of a novel monoenergetic extrapolation software algorithm.
Schabel C; Bongers M; Sedlmair M; Korn A; Grosse U; Mangold S; Claussen CD; Thomas C
Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 24756426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive digital energy subtraction angiography with a channeling-radiation x-ray source.
Gary CK; Piestrup MA; Boyers DG; Pincus CI; Pantell RH; Rothbart GB
Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1527-35. PubMed ID: 8289737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of vascular contrast and depiction of stenoses in abdominopelvic and lower extremity vasculature: comparison of dual-energy MDCT with digital subtraction angiography.
Huang SY; Nelson RC; Miller MJ; Kim CY; Lawson JH; Husarik DB; Boll DT
Acad Radiol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1149-57. PubMed ID: 22743115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of motion artefacts in non-gated dual-energy radiography.
Kyriakou Y; Ertel D; Lapp RM; Kalender WA
Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 82(975):235-42. PubMed ID: 19098084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
