These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2586373)

  • 21. Feasibility of ultra-low radiation dose digital subtraction angiography: Preliminary study in a simplified cerebral angiography phantom.
    Maeng JY; Song Y; Sung YS; Kim TI; Lee DH; Kim TH
    Interv Neuroradiol; 2019 Oct; 25(5):589-595. PubMed ID: 31096837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification-based summation of cerebral digital subtraction angiography series for image post-processing algorithms.
    Schuldhaus D; Spiegel M; Redel T; Polyanskaya M; Struffert T; Hornegger J; Doerfler A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 56(6):1791-802. PubMed ID: 21346277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. K-edge digital subtraction imaging with dichromatic x-ray sources: SNR and dose studies.
    Sarnelli A; Elleaume H; Taibi A; Gambaccini M; Bravin A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4311-28. PubMed ID: 16912383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The application of matched filtering to contrast material dose reduction in digital subtraction angiography.
    Riederer SJ; Enzmann DR; Brody WR; Hall AL
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):853-8. PubMed ID: 6342035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Iterative image-domain decomposition for dual-energy CT.
    Niu T; Dong X; Petrongolo M; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041901. PubMed ID: 24694132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Some useful concepts of matched filtering in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Maier JK; Riederer SJ; Enzmann DR; Brody WR
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(5):424-31. PubMed ID: 6392153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of x-ray energy dispersion in digital subtraction imaging at the iodine K-edge--a Monte Carlo study.
    Prino F; Ceballos C; Cabal A; Sarnelli A; Gambaccini M; Ramello L
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18293556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Noise reduction in FLAIR
    Schranzer R; Rauscher A; Haimburger E; Bredies K; Reishofer G; Grabner G
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 28(4):286-292. PubMed ID: 29233600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Limitations of the lead oxide vidicon for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Van Lysel MS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 18222858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of head dual energy computed tomography angiography and neuro digital subtraction angiography].
    Xu Y; Wen L; Han D; Ma CW
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 21219804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Geometric quantitative coronary arteriography. A comparison of unsubtracted and dual energy-subtracted images.
    Weber DM; Molloi SY; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):649-54. PubMed ID: 1885271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CCD camera for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Qian YJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 18215878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
    Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adaptive noise correction of dual-energy computed tomography images.
    Maia RS; Jacob C; Hara AK; Silva AC; Pavlicek W; Mitchell JR
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Apr; 11(4):667-78. PubMed ID: 26463839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective criteria for acceptability and constancy tests of digital subtraction angiography.
    de las Heras H; Torres R; Fernández-Soto JM; Vañó E
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):272-6. PubMed ID: 26522881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Carotid dual-energy CT angiography: Evaluation of low keV calculated monoenergetic datasets by means of a frequency-split approach for noise reduction at low keV levels.
    Riffel P; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Morelli JN; Schmidt B; Schoenberg SO; Henzler T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):720-5. PubMed ID: 26971414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of dual-energy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone-subtraction CT angiography.
    Deng K; Liu C; Ma R; Sun C; Wang XM; Ma ZT; Sun XL
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 19348851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Affine transformation-based automatic registration for peripheral digital subtraction angiography (DSA)].
    Kong G; Dai DQ; Zou LM
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 32(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 18973035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.