These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn. Moreno JD Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 3595056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment". Gerry MH Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants. Newman SA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dilemmas in the care of impaired infants: effects on nursing and health care. Kraft LA; Wilson CJ Neonatal Netw; 1988 Apr; 6(5):73-81. PubMed ID: 3352589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Do the "Baby Doe" rules ignore suffering? Kopelman LM Second Opin; 1993 Apr; 18(4):101-13. PubMed ID: 10125415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns. Fost N Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law. Johnstone BV Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Playing God in the NICU. Ethical guidelines focus on what seems best for the handicapped infant--Saint Vincent Health Center, Erie, PA. Drane JF Health Prog; 1989 Mar; 70(2):26-31. PubMed ID: 10318203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary. Tucker BP Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment? Smith GP J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life. Wakefield-Fisher M Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]