140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25866149)
1. To adjust or not to adjust for baseline when analyzing repeated binary responses? The case of complete data when treatment comparison at study end is of interest.
Jiang H; Kulkarni PM; Mallinckrodt CH; Shurzinske L; Molenberghs G; Lipkovich I
Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 25866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power difference in a χ
Miller ML; Roe DJ; Hu C; Bell ML
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32122312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
Moerbeek M; van Schie S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the analysis of composite measures of quality in medical research.
Moineddin R; Meaney C; Grunfeld E
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):633-660. PubMed ID: 25296866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
Moore KL; van der Laan MJ
Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):39-64. PubMed ID: 18985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
Pedroza C; Truong VTT
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.
Shepherd BE; Shaw PA; Dodd LE
Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 22848072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative binomial meta-regression analysis of combined glycosylated hemoglobin and hypoglycemia outcomes across eleven Phase III and IV studies of insulin glargine compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Mullins P; Sharplin P; Yki-Jarvinen H; Riddle MC; Haring HU
Clin Ther; 2007 Aug; 29(8):1607-19. PubMed ID: 17919543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aggregating and Analyzing Daily Drinking Data in Clinical Trials: A Comparison of Type I Errors, Power, and Bias.
Hallgren KA; Atkins DC; Witkiewitz K
J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2016 Nov; 77(6):986-991. PubMed ID: 27797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating tests for cluster-randomized trials with few clusters under generalized linear mixed models with covariate adjustment: A simulation study.
Qiu H; Cook AJ; Bobb JF
Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(2):201-215. PubMed ID: 37933766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of covariate misclassification using generalized linear regression under covariate-adaptive randomization.
Fan L; Yeatts SD; Wolf BJ; McClure LA; Selim M; Palesch YY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 26596352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of group means using Bayesian generalized linear mixed models.
LaLonde A; Qu Y
Pharm Stat; 2020 Jul; 19(4):482-491. PubMed ID: 32107840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of longitudinal binary data with missing data due to dropouts.
Ali MW; Talukder E
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):993-1007. PubMed ID: 16279357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeated probit regression when covariates are measured with error.
Follmann DA; Hunsberger SA; Albert PS
Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 11318193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; DiazOrdaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3092-3109. PubMed ID: 28557022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
Hernández AV; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16275011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of covariate adjustment at randomization and analysis for binary outcomes: understanding differences between superiority and noninferiority trials.
Nicholas K; Yeatts SD; Zhao W; Ciolino J; Borg K; Durkalski V
Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(11):1834-40. PubMed ID: 25641057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
