These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25866149)

  • 41. Interaction of treatment with a continuous variable: simulation study of significance level for several methods of analysis.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(22):3788-803. PubMed ID: 23580422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accounting for center in the Early External Cephalic Version trials: an empirical comparison of statistical methods to adjust for center in a multicenter trial with binary outcomes.
    Reitsma A; Chu R; Thorpe J; McDonald S; Thabane L; Hutton E
    Trials; 2014 Sep; 15():377. PubMed ID: 25257928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Bender R; Vervölgyi V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bias-reduced and separation-proof GEE with small or sparse longitudinal binary data.
    Mondol MH; Rahman MS
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2544-2560. PubMed ID: 30793784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
    Frank Liu G; Zhan X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biomass Fuel Smoke and Tuberculosis: A Case-Control Study.
    Haque MA; Barman N; Islam MT; Mannan M; Khan MH; Karim MR; Rob MA; Hossain MA
    Mymensingh Med J; 2016 Jan; 25(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 26931246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A class of Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Allocation Designs for Multitreatment Binary Response Trials.
    Biswas A; Bhattacharya R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):809-823. PubMed ID: 29913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two new covariate adjustment methods for non-inferiority assessment of binary clinical trials data.
    Hou Y; Ding V; Li K; Zhou XH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 21191856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Simulation-Based Comparison of Covariate Adjustment Methods for the Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Chaussé P; Liu J; Luta G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Apr; 13(4):414. PubMed ID: 27077870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Beyond repeated-measures analysis of variance: advanced statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in anesthesia research.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M; Memtsoudis SG
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 22189576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for binary response.
    Rosenberger WF; Vidyashankar AN; Agarwal DK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001 Nov; 11(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12018777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).
    Ma J; Thabane L; Kaczorowski J; Chambers L; Dolovich L; Karwalajtys T; Levitt C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome.
    Pedroza C; Truong VT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):113. PubMed ID: 27576307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34879711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mixed Models for Repeated Measures Should Include Time-by-Covariate Interactions to Assure Power Gains and Robustness Against Dropout Bias Relative to Complete-Case ANCOVA.
    Schuler A
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2022 Jan; 56(1):145-154. PubMed ID: 34674187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of predictor approaches for longitudinal binary outcomes: application to anesthesiology data.
    Aktas Samur A; Coskunfirat N; Saka O
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e648. PubMed ID: 25374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
    Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.