183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 258663)
1. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
Brief AP
J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appraising the performance of performance appraisal.
Brinkerhoff DW; Kanter RM
Sloan Manage Rev; 1980; 21(3):3-16. PubMed ID: 10249849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
Ross SR
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MBO and performance appraisal.
Golightly C
J Nurs Adm; 1979 Sep; 9(9):11-20. PubMed ID: 258255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance appraisal: a positive management tool.
Smith KE
Coll Rev; 1984; 1(2):43-62. PubMed ID: 10268509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An appraisal system that yields results.
Blai B
Superv Manage; 1983 Nov; 28(11):39-42. PubMed ID: 10263109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A checklist for evaluating administrators.
Hosp Trustee; 1978; 2(5):5-8. PubMed ID: 10239699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing performance standards for personnel performance.
Halterman CA
Quintessence Dent Technol; 1981 Apr; 5(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 6941338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Guidelines for effective and defensible performance appraisal systems.
Wells RG
Pers J; 1982 Oct; 61(10):776-82. PubMed ID: 10258015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure.
Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M
Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Employee performance appraisal presents unique opportunities.
Harris JG
Tex Hosp; 1985 Nov; 41(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 10275243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Managing by behavior and results--linking supervisory accountability to effective organizational control.
Johnson J; Luciano K
J Nurs Adm; 1983 Dec; 13(12):19-28. PubMed ID: 6557132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance appraisal for the '80s.
Brush DH; Schoenfeldt LF
Pers Adm; 1982 Dec; 27(12):76-83. PubMed ID: 10260398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance appraisal, 2: Improving the rater's effectiveness.
Martin DC
Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 10278733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance appraisal, 1: Risks and rewards.
Romberg RV
Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):20-6. PubMed ID: 10278732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management tools for the modern day health administrator. Part 5. Setting standards and motivating tools.
Snook ID; Zimmerman GM
Hosp Top; 1984; 62(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 10264678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
Beck S
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten myths about criterion reference performance appraisal.
Berger L; Clipp FP
South Hosp; 1982; 50(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 10257273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Study of nurses performance evaluation--theoretic references (I)].
Kurcgant P
Rev Esc Enferm USP; 1986 Apr; 20(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 3642625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Managing the performance evaluation system: a case study.
Tanner S; Greene L
Health Care Superv; 1986 Jan; 4(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 10274986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
