These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25866892)

  • 1. A prospective randomized trial comparing subatmospheric wound therapy with a sealed gauze dressing and the standard vacuum-assisted closure device: a supplementary subgroup analysis of infected wounds.
    Dorafshar AH; Franczyk M; Karian L; Teven C; Wroblewski K; Gottlieb LJ; Lohman RF
    Wounds; 2013 May; 25(5):121-30. PubMed ID: 25866892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective randomized trial comparing subatmospheric wound therapy with a sealed gauze dressing and the standard vacuum-assisted closure device.
    Dorafshar AH; Franczyk M; Gottlieb LJ; Wroblewski KE; Lohman RF
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21712704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two methods of securing skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy: vacuum-assisted closure and gauze suction.
    Nguyen TQ; Franczyk M; Lee JC; Greives MR; O'Connor A; Gottlieb LJ
    J Burn Care Res; 2015; 36(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 25162948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of negative pressure wound therapy modalities, VAC versus non-commercial NPWT alternatives: A systematic review of RCTs/CCTs.
    Madrigal P; Moshal T; Bernabe R; Yenikomshian H; Gillenwater J
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Nov; 31(4):630-636. PubMed ID: 36289040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of subatmospheric pressure and hyperbaric oxygen in ischemic full-thickness wound healing.
    Fabian TS; Kaufman HJ; Lett ED; Thomas JB; Rawl DK; Lewis PL; Summitt JB; Merryman JI; Schaeffer TD; Sargent LA; Burns RP
    Am Surg; 2000 Dec; 66(12):1136-43. PubMed ID: 11149585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of dressing type on 3D tissue microdeformations during negative pressure wound therapy: a computational study.
    Wilkes R; Zhao Y; Kieswetter K; Haridas B
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031012. PubMed ID: 19154071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of vacuum-assisted wound closure to manage limb wounds in patients suffering from acute necrotizing fasciitis.
    Huang WS; Hsieh SC; Hsieh CS; Schoung JY; Huang T
    Asian J Surg; 2006 Jul; 29(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 16877210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial.
    Mouës CM; Vos MC; van den Bemd GJ; Stijnen T; Hovius SE
    Wound Repair Regen; 2004; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 14974959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of subatmospheric pressure on the acute healing wound.
    Miller Q; Bird E; Bird K; Meschter C; Moulton MJ
    Curr Surg; 2004; 61(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 15051265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lidocaine analgesia for removal of wound vacuum-assisted closure dressings: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.
    Christensen TJ; Thorum T; Kubiak EN
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Feb; 27(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 23343829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vacuum drainage in the management of complicated abdominal wound dehiscence in children.
    Pauniaho SL; Costa J; Boken C; Turnock R; Baillie CT
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Sep; 44(9):1736-40. PubMed ID: 19735817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings.
    Perez D; Bramkamp M; Exe C; von Ruden C; Ziegler A
    Am J Surg; 2010 Jan; 199(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19362288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of traumatic war wounds using vacuum-assisted closure dressings in an austere environment.
    Machen S
    US Army Med Dep J; 2007; ():17-23. PubMed ID: 20084702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subatmospheric pressure wound therapy and the vacuum-assisted closure device: basic science and current clinical successes.
    Plikaitis CM; Molnar JA
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2006 Mar; 3(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 16515384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of vacuum-assisted closure on lymph vessels in chronic wounds.
    Labanaris AP; Polykandriotis E; Horch RE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Aug; 62(8):1068-75. PubMed ID: 18524708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy on wounds of the diabetic foot.
    Armstrong DG; Lavery LA; Abu-Rumman P; Espensen EH; Vazquez JR; Nixon BP; Boulton AJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Apr; 48(4):64-8. PubMed ID: 11993062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy as a pretreatment for split thickness skin grafts.
    Saaiq M; Hameed-Ud-Din ; Khan MI; Chaudhery SM
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Oct; 20(10):675-9. PubMed ID: 20943111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A technique for the treatment of sternal infections using the Vacuum Assisted Closure device.
    Hersh RE; Kaza AK; Long SM; Fiser SM; Drake DB; Tribble CG
    Heart Surg Forum; 2001; 4(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11673139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC)/negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for difficult wounds: A review.
    Agarwal P; Kukrele R; Sharma D
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2019; 10(5):845-848. PubMed ID: 31528055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of negative pressure vacuum-assisted system in acute and chronic wounds closure: our experience.
    Chiummariello S; Guarro G; Pica A; Alfano C
    G Chir; 2012 Oct; 33(10):358-62. PubMed ID: 23095568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.