105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25866905)
1. The impact of screening-test negative samples not enumerated by MPN.
Corbellini LG; Duarte AS; de Knegt LV; da Silva LE; Cardoso M; Nauta M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Jul; 205():1-6. PubMed ID: 25866905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods for fitting a parametric probability distribution to most probable number data.
Williams MS; Ebel ED
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 157(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 22658686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of slaughterhouse and day of sample on the probability of a pig carcass being Salmonella-positive according to the Enterobacteriaceae count in the largest Brazilian pork production region.
Corbellini LG; Júnior AB; de Freitas Costa E; Duarte AS; Albuquerque ER; Kich JD; Cardoso M; Nauta M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 228():58-66. PubMed ID: 27107299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative distribution of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli on beef carcasses and raw beef at retail establishments.
Martínez-Chávez L; Cabrera-Diaz E; Pérez-Montaño JA; Garay-Martínez LE; Varela-Hernández JJ; Castillo A; Lucia L; Ávila-Novoa MG; Cardona-López MA; Gutiérrez-González P; Martínez-Gonzáles NE
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 210():149-55. PubMed ID: 26125489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size guidelines for fitting a lognormal probability distribution to censored most probable number data with a Markov chain Monte Carlo method.
Williams MS; Cao Y; Ebel ED
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 165(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 23727652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a cross contamination model describing transfer of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes during grinding of pork and beef.
Møller CO; Sant'Ana AS; Hansen SK; Nauta MJ; Silva LP; Alvarenga VO; Maffei D; Silva FF; Lopes JT; Franco BD; Aabo S; Hansen TB
Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 226():42-52. PubMed ID: 27035678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification and prevalence of Salmonella in beef cattle presenting at slaughter.
Fegan N; Vanderlinde P; Higgs G; Desmarchelier P
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(5):892-8. PubMed ID: 15479403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling prevalence and counts from most probable number in a bayesian framework: an application to Salmonella typhimurium in fresh pork sausages.
Gonzales-Barron U; Redmond G; Butler F
J Food Prot; 2010 Aug; 73(8):1416-22. PubMed ID: 20819350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of Salmonella in food samples from India using the MINI-MSRV MPN and modified MINI-MSRV MPN methods.
Shashidhar R; Srivastava I; Bandekar JR
J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):M564-7. PubMed ID: 22417597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Salmonella control in live pigs and at slaughter.
De Busser EV; De Zutter L; Dewulf J; Houf K; Maes D
Vet J; 2013 Apr; 196(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23414643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enumeration and characterization of Salmonella isolates from retail chicken carcasses in Beijing, China.
Wang Y; Chen Q; Cui S; Xu X; Zhu J; Luo H; Wang D; Li F
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2014 Feb; 11(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24134666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Salmonella survival in dry-cured Italian salami.
Bonardi S; Bruini I; Bolzoni L; Cozzolino P; Pierantoni M; Brindani F; Bellotti P; Renzi M; Pongolini S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 262():99-106. PubMed ID: 28982061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of Salmonella carcass contamination by a comparative quantitative analysis of E. coli and Salmonella during pig slaughter.
Nauta M; Barfod K; Hald T; Sørensen AH; Emborg HD; Aabo S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 166(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 23973833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance objectives for Salmonella in fresh pork meat intended to be eaten cooked: how to derive them and verify their achievement.
Manfreda G; Valero A; Rodríguez-Lázaro D; Hernández M; Pasquali F; De Cesare A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():55-9. PubMed ID: 24906995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Research on quantitative method and contamination level of
Sun HH; Ling XM; Li Y; Li Y; Cui SH; Bai L
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 55(8):999-1005. PubMed ID: 34445840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between slaughter practices and the distribution of Salmonella and hygiene indicator bacteria on pig carcasses during slaughter.
Biasino W; De Zutter L; Mattheus W; Bertrand S; Uyttendaele M; Van Damme I
Food Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 70():192-199. PubMed ID: 29173627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic approach for determining Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes concentration in pork meat from presence/absence microbiological data.
Valero A; Hernandez M; De Cesare A; Manfreda G; García-Gimeno RM; González-García P; Rodríguez-Lázaro D
Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():60-3. PubMed ID: 24661505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A practical framework for the construction of a biotracing model: application to Salmonella in the pork slaughter chain.
Smid JH; Swart AN; Havelaar AH; Pielaat A
Risk Anal; 2011 Sep; 31(9):1434-50. PubMed ID: 21418081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction to trace the fate of generic Escherichia coli within a high capacity pork slaughter line.
Namvar A; Warriner K
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16386814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment for Salmonella in Pigs for the European Union.
Snary EL; Swart AN; Simons RR; Domingues AR; Vigre H; Evers EG; Hald T; Hill AA
Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 27002672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
