These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25867106)
1. Eyewitness identification: Bayesian information gain, base-rate effect equivalency curves, and reasonable suspicion. Wells GL; Yang Y; Smalarz L Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):99-122. PubMed ID: 25867106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis. Wixted JT; Wells GL Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eyewitness identification: information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. Wells GL; Olson EA J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Sep; 8(3):155-67. PubMed ID: 12240928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves. Yang Y; Smith AM Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eyewitness testimony. Wells GL; Olson EA Annu Rev Psychol; 2003; 54():277-95. PubMed ID: 12209024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology. Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy? Bergold AN; Heaton P Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four utilities in eyewitness identification practice: Dissociations between receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and expected utility analysis. Lampinen JM; Smith AM; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):26-44. PubMed ID: 30382722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An expected cost model of eyewitness identification. Yang Y; Smalarz L; Moody SA; Cabell JJ; Copp CJ Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):205-219. PubMed ID: 31045389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Palmer MA; Brewer N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions. Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]