These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25867176)

  • 1. Bayesian decision making in human collectives with binary choices.
    Eguíluz VM; Masuda N; Fernández-Gracia J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121332. PubMed ID: 25867176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species.
    Arganda S; Pérez-Escudero A; de Polavieja GG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20508-13. PubMed ID: 23197836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.
    Granovskiy B; Gold JM; Sumpter DJ; Goldstone RL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):469-93. PubMed ID: 26189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrete confidence levels revealed by sequential decisions.
    Lisi M; Mongillo G; Milne G; Dekker T; Gorea A
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 5(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 32958899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Ising Decision Maker: a binary stochastic network for choice response time.
    Verdonck S; Tuerlinckx F
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):422-462. PubMed ID: 25090426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The myopia of crowds: Cognitive load and collective evaluation of answers on Stack Exchange.
    Burghardt K; Alsina EF; Girvan M; Rand W; Lerman K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173610. PubMed ID: 28301531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate-choice copying as Bayesian decision making.
    Uehara T; Yokomizo H; Iwasa Y
    Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 15729669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collective animal behavior from Bayesian estimation and probability matching.
    Pérez-Escudero A; de Polavieja GG
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Nov; 7(11):e1002282. PubMed ID: 22125487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence reports in decision-making with multiple alternatives violate the Bayesian confidence hypothesis.
    Li HH; Ma WJ
    Nat Commun; 2020 Apr; 11(1):2004. PubMed ID: 32332712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adversity magnifies the importance of social information in decision-making.
    Pérez-Escudero A; de Polavieja GG
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Nov; 14(136):. PubMed ID: 29187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inherently irrational? A computational model of escalation of commitment as Bayesian Updating.
    Gilroy SP; Hantula DA
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():43-51. PubMed ID: 26945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():12-38. PubMed ID: 26010559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human online adaptation to changes in prior probability.
    Norton EH; Acerbi L; Ma WJ; Landy MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jul; 15(7):e1006681. PubMed ID: 31283765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-Making under Ambiguity Is Modulated by Visual Framing, but Not by Motor vs. Non-Motor Context. Experiments and an Information-Theoretic Ambiguity Model.
    Grau-Moya J; Ortega PA; Braun DA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153179. PubMed ID: 27124723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a mental arithmetic process in risky choices.
    Rao LL; Liu XN; Li Q; Zhou Y; Liang ZY; Sun HY; Zhou RL; Li S
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 24128658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rating exposure control using Bayesian decision analysis.
    Hewett P; Logan P; Mulhausen J; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Oct; 3(10):568-81. PubMed ID: 16998991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.
    Pedersen ML; Frank MJ; Biele G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1234-1251. PubMed ID: 27966103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sure enough: efficient Bayesian learning and choice.
    Foley BR; Marjoram P
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):867-880. PubMed ID: 28669114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational mate choice: theory and empirical evidence.
    Castellano S; Cadeddu G; Cermelli P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 22410366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review.
    Spiegelhalter DJ; Myles JP; Jones DR; Abrams KR
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(38):1-130. PubMed ID: 11134920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.