These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25867503)

  • 21. Vertically arrayed stimuli and responses: transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to Simon task occurs regardless of response-device orientation.
    Zhong Q; Xiong A; Vu KL; Proctor RW
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):175-185. PubMed ID: 29103132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the temporal dynamics of spatial stimulus-response transfer between spatial incompatibility and Simon tasks.
    Ivanoff J; Blagdon R; Feener S; McNeil M; Muir PH
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():243. PubMed ID: 25191217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.
    Ziessler M; Nattkemper D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):595-613. PubMed ID: 11394669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transfer effects of manipulating temporal constraints on learning a two-choice reaction time task with low stimulus-response compatibility.
    Chen DD; Pei L; Chan JS; Yan JH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 23265006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emergence of the go/no-go Simon effect by means of practice and mixing paradigms.
    Lugli L; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 23743341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction.
    Theeuwes M; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1470-1480. PubMed ID: 24884648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.
    Ambrosecchia M; Marino BF; Gawryszewski LG; Riggio L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():283. PubMed ID: 26042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reinforcement learning of irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulates cognitive control.
    Chen J; Tan L; Liu L; Wang L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1585-1598. PubMed ID: 32324022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to the vertical Simon task generalizes across effectors but not stimulus features.
    Zhong Q; Proctor RW; Xiong A; Vu KL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):1-11. PubMed ID: 32140934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.
    Iani C; Rubichi S; Gherri E; Nicoletti R
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 19246350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Control Modulated by Reinforcement Learning of Irrelevant Stimulus-Response Associations.
    Zhang D; Liu L; Huang B; Wang L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 34(11):2048-2064. PubMed ID: 35900861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set.
    Gaschler R; Frensch PA; Cohen A; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1389-407. PubMed ID: 22545612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning associations between action and perception: effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial priming.
    Wiggett AJ; Hudson M; Tipper SP; Downing PE
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 21481998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.