These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25867504)

  • 1. Exemplar variance supports robust learning of facial identity.
    Murphy J; Ipser A; Gaigg SB; Cook R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):577-81. PubMed ID: 25867504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similar exemplar pooling processes underlie the learning of facial identity and handwriting style: Evidence from typical observers and individuals with Autism.
    Ipser A; Ring M; Murphy J; Gaigg SB; Cook R
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 May; 85():169-76. PubMed ID: 27001029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ensemble coding of face identity is not independent of the coding of individual identity.
    Neumann MF; Ng R; Rhodes G; Palermo R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1357-1366. PubMed ID: 28398128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High and low performers differ in the use of shape information for face recognition.
    Kaufmann JM; Schulz C; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1310-9. PubMed ID: 23562837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for view-invariant face recognition units in unfamiliar face learning.
    Etchells DB; Brooks JL; Johnston RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):874-889. PubMed ID: 27809666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.
    Balas B; Saville A
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():228-236. PubMed ID: 28025050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
    Weibert K; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ensemble coding of facial identity is not refined by experience: Evidence from other-race and inverted faces.
    Davis EE; Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):265-281. PubMed ID: 32740911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does a newly encountered face become familiar? The effect of within-person variability on adults' and children's perception of identity.
    Baker KA; Laurence S; Mondloch CJ
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():19-30. PubMed ID: 28092773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatiotemporal changes in neural response patterns to faces varying in visual familiarity.
    Natu VS; O'Toole AJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():151-9. PubMed ID: 25524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term information and distributed neural activation are relevant for the "internal features advantage" in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence.
    Olivares EI; Saavedra C; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Iglesias J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 24025156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Same critical features are used for identification of familiarized and unfamiliar faces.
    Abudarham N; Yovel G
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():105-111. PubMed ID: 29360472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational insights into human perceptual expertise for familiar and unfamiliar face recognition.
    Blauch NM; Behrmann M; Plaut DC
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104341. PubMed ID: 32586632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning the moves: the effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format.
    Roark DA; O'Toole AJ; Abdi H; Barrett SE
    Perception; 2006; 35(6):761-73. PubMed ID: 16836043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finding an unfamiliar face in a line-up: Viewing multiple images of the target is beneficial on target-present trials but costly on target-absent trials.
    Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):758-776. PubMed ID: 29658990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in Photos of the Same Face Drives Improvements in Identity Verification.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1332-41. PubMed ID: 26562899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.