These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25867613)

  • 1. Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory.
    van Moorselaar D; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J; Lamme VA; Sligte IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1755-63. PubMed ID: 25867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction to Van Moorselaar et al. (2015).
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1727. PubMed ID: 26213836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down modulation of alpha power and pattern similarity for threatening representations in visual short-term memory.
    Kuo BC; Li CH; Lin SH; Hu SH; Yeh YY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():21-30. PubMed ID: 28887064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional interplay of top-down attention with affective codes during visual short-term memory maintenance.
    Kuo BC; Lin SH; Yeh YY
    Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():55-70. PubMed ID: 29554542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The lasting memory enhancements of retrospective attention.
    Reaves S; Strunk J; Phillips S; Verhaeghen P; Duarte A
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():226-237. PubMed ID: 27038756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect?
    Makovski T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):470-6. PubMed ID: 22415524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting Attention to Auditory and Visual Short-term Memory: The Roles of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognitive Status.
    Garami L; Chow R; Fakuade A; Swaminathan S; Alain C
    Exp Aging Res; 2020; 46(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31750789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociable loss of the representations in visual short-term memory.
    Li J
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 26786730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural mechanisms by which attention modulates the comparison of remembered and perceptual representations.
    Kuo BC; Astle DE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86666. PubMed ID: 24466193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention restores discrete items to visual short-term memory.
    Murray AM; Nobre AC; Clark IA; Cravo AM; Stokes MG
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Apr; 24(4):550-6. PubMed ID: 23436786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of multiple cued items is possible during visual short-term memory maintenance.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1625-46. PubMed ID: 25824888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?
    Sligte IG; Scholte HS; Lamme VA
    PLoS One; 2008 Feb; 3(2):e1699. PubMed ID: 18301775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.