These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25867997)

  • 1. Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system.
    Pietraszewski D; Curry OS; Petersen MB; Cosmides L; Tooby J
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():24-39. PubMed ID: 25867997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The content of our cooperation, not the color of our skin: an alliance detection system regulates categorization by coalition and race, but not sex.
    Pietraszewski D; Cosmides L; Tooby J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88534. PubMed ID: 24520394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A (failed) attempt to falsify the alliance hypothesis of racial categorization: Racial categorization is not reduced when crossed with a nonalliance category.
    Pietraszewski D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2195-2203. PubMed ID: 35786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization.
    Kurzban R; Tooby J; Cosmides L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Dec; 98(26):15387-92. PubMed ID: 11742078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missing the Party: Political Categorization and Reasoning in the Absence of Party Label Cues.
    Heit E; Nicholson SP
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jul; 8(3):697-714. PubMed ID: 27177872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correct way to test the hypothesis that racial categorization is a byproduct of an evolved alliance-tracking capacity.
    Pietraszewski D
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3404. PubMed ID: 33564063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization.
    Klauer KC; Hölzenbein F; Calanchini J; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Jul; 107(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 24956312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Political Alliance Formation and Cooperation Networks in the Utah State Legislature.
    Davis CA; Redhead D; Macfarlan SJ
    Hum Nat; 2022 Mar; 33(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 35175544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More Polarized but More Independent: Political Party Identification and Ideological Self-Categorization Among U.S. Adults, College Students, and Late Adolescents, 1970-2015.
    Twenge JM; Honeycutt N; Prislin R; Sherman RA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1364-83. PubMed ID: 27604353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reframing social categorization as latent structure learning for understanding political behaviour.
    Lau T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200136. PubMed ID: 33611992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. If they were to vote, they would vote for us.
    Koudenburg N; Postmes T; Gordijn EH
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1506-10. PubMed ID: 22095975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To be or not to be: the impact of implicit versus explicit inappropriate social categorizations on the self.
    Barreto M; Ellemers N; Scholten W; Smith H
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Mar; 49(Pt 1):43-67. PubMed ID: 19220934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiological responses and partisan bias: beyond self-reported measures of party identification.
    Petersen MB; Giessing A; Nielsen J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126922. PubMed ID: 26010527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social identification among political party voters and members: an empirical test of optimal distinctiveness theory.
    Van Hiel A; Mervielde I
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Apr; 142(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 11999872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decoding "us" and "them": Neural representations of generalized group concepts.
    Cikara M; Van Bavel JJ; Ingbretsen ZA; Lau T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 May; 146(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 28459261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: the effects of need to evaluate.
    Bizer GY; Krosnick JA; Holbrook AL; Wheeler SC; Rucker DD; Petty RE
    J Pers; 2004 Oct; 72(5):995-1027. PubMed ID: 15335335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Politics of Affirmation Theory: When Group-Affirmation Leads to Greater Ingroup Bias.
    Ehrlich GA; Gramzow RH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1110-22. PubMed ID: 26070859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Person categorization and automatic racial stereotyping effects on weapon identification.
    Jones CR; Fazio RH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1073-85. PubMed ID: 20693386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural basis of ideological differences in race categorization.
    Krosch AR; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200139. PubMed ID: 33611997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed Independents.
    Hawkins CB; Nosek BA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1437-52. PubMed ID: 22875789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.