These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

846 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25868092)

  • 1. Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: an analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence database for acute and long-term costs and complications.
    Radcliff K; Zigler J; Zigler J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):521-9. PubMed ID: 25868092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Comparison of Health Care Utilization and Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Kumar C; Dietz N; Sharma M; Wang D; Ugiliweneza B; Boakye M
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e855-e865. PubMed ID: 31733395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009.
    Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 24108292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Tracey RW; Kang DG; Cody JP; Wagner SC; Rosner MK; Lehman RA
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1905-8. PubMed ID: 24986154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.
    Saifi C; Fein AW; Cazzulino A; Lehman RA; Phillips FM; An HS; Riew KD
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29128581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?
    Chang PY; Chang HK; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):577-585. PubMed ID: 28291414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology.
    Nesterenko SO; Riley LH; Skolasky RL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):1470-4. PubMed ID: 22343278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zou S; Gao J; Xu B; Lu X; Han Y; Meng H
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 27314663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Qureshi SA; McAnany S; Goz V; Koehler SM; Hecht AC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 24010896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.
    Radcliff K; Lerner J; Yang C; Bernard T; Zigler JE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26824587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Zavras AG; Acosta JR; Holmberg KJ; Semenza NC; Jayamohan HR; Cheng BC; Altman DT; Sauber RD
    Spine J; 2024 Oct; 24(10):1858-1871. PubMed ID: 38843960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Database.
    Miller AK; Zakko P; Park DK; Chang VW; Schultz L; Springer K; Hamilton TM; Abdulhak MM; Schwalb JM; Nerenz DR; Aleem IS; Khalil JG
    Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):791-799. PubMed ID: 38110089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dong L; Xu Z; Chen X; Wang D; Li D; Liu T; Hao D
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1549-1558. PubMed ID: 28625479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.
    Bhashyam N; De la Garza Ramos R; Nakhla J; Nasser R; Jada A; Purvis TE; Sciubba DM; Kinon MD; Yassari R
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E6. PubMed ID: 28142261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilization trends of cervical artificial disc replacement during the FDA investigational device exemption clinical trials compared to anterior cervical fusion.
    Qureshi SA; Koehler SM; Lu Y; Cho S; Hecht AC
    J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1723-6. PubMed ID: 23972533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.